Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  189 / 453 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 189 / 453 Next Page
Page Background

Page

11

of

17

O157 and the reference method indicated that there was no significant difference

at the 5% level between the number of positive results by the two methods. The

POD analysis between the 3M

MDA 2 -

E. coli

O157 presumptive and

confirmed results indicated that there was no significant difference at the 5%

level. A summary of POD analyses [9] are presented in Tables 4-7 of the

Appendix.

Table C: Summary of Results

Matrix

Raw Ground Beef (73% lean 27% fat)

Method

3M

MDA 2 -

E. coli

O157

USDA/FSIS

MLG 5.09

Result

Presumptive

Confirmed

Time Point

10 Hours

10 Hours

Uninoculated

0/5

0/5

0/5

Low

11/20

11/20

7/20

High

5/5

5/5

5/5

Raw Ground Beef- 10 Hour Enrichment

For the low inoculation level of the 3M

MDA 2 -

E. coli

O157,

there were 11 presumptive positives and 11 confirmed

positives following the USDA/FSIS MLG 5B.05 reference

method. There were 7 confirmed positives for the reference

method. For the high inoculation level, there were 5

presumptive positives and 5 confirmed positives following the

USDA/FSIS MLG 5.09 reference method. There were 5

confirmed positives following the reference method.

For the low inoculation level, a dPOD

C

value of 0.20 was

obtained with a 95% confidence interval of (-0.10, 0.46),

indicating no statistically significant difference between the

candidate and reference method. A dPOD

CP

value of 0.00 was

obtained with a 95% confidence interval of (-0.28, 0.28),

indicating no statistically significant difference between the

candidate presumptive and the USDA/FSIS MLG 5.09

reference method confirmed results.

For the high inoculation level, a dPOD

C

value of 0.00 was

obtained with a 95% confidence interval of (-0.43, 0.43),

indicating no statistically significant difference between the

candidate and reference method. A dPOD

CP

value of 0.00 was

obtained with a 95% confidence interval of (-0.43, 0.43),

indicating no statistically significant difference between the

candidate presumptive and confirmed results. Detailed results

of the POD analyses are presented in Tables 5 and 7 of the

Appendix.