Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  231 / 453 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 231 / 453 Next Page
Page Background

19

Subsequently, these samples were screened as negative on the

mericon

E. coliSTEC O-Type

1

assay. These results indicate that these two assays when run in combination, can detect the

2

potential presence of pathogenic genes, but at the same time screen the sample negative for

E.

3

coli

O157 and the Top Six STEC. Additionally, a few of the false positive results obtained had

4

high CT values (>36 CT). These false positive results could be attributed to cross reactivity with

5

background flora that is sometimes observed with matrices with high background counts, or

6

could be the resultof cross contamination from the samples that were inoculated at a high level

7

that were processed prior right before or after the sample. No false negative results were

8

observed for samples analyzed by either assay with manual extraction or with the screening

9

assay and automated extraction. Minimal false negative results (5 false negative results out of

10

432 total samples) were observed for the STEC O-Type assay with automated extraction. Three

11

of the false negative results occurred on a reanalysis of the test sample after the initial sample

12

produced an invalid result (no internal CT value was observed). This may indicate that an error

13

in the sample processing occurred due to the sample containing high levels of particulate. Due to

14

availability of reagents, the reanalysis also occurred several days later, and an increase in

15

background flora may have resulted in the non-detection of the target analyte.

16

17

Recommendations

18

19

It is recommended that the

mericon

E. coliO157Screen Plus and

mericon

E. coliSTEC O-Type

20

method be adopted as Official First Action status for the detection of

E. coli

O157 and the Top

21

Six STEC (

E. coli

O26, O45, O103, O111, O121 and O145 in selected foods: raw ground beef

22

(73%) (325 g), raw beef trim (375 g) and spinach (25 g).

23

24

Acknowledgements

25

26

We would like to extend a sincere thank you to the following collaborators for their dedicated

27

participation in this study:

28

29

Dorn Clark, Michaeline Endres & Kody Guden- Marshfield Food Safety, LLC- Marshfield, WI

30

Leslie Thompson, Cole Liska, Adam Sexton, Eric Draper & Luke Arnts –

31

Vanguard Sciences - North Sioux City, SD

32

Brian Kupski, Upasana Hariram, Jeanette Franklin, Jiaojie Zheng, & Nirlep Kaur –

33

Mérieux NutriSciences – Crete, IL

34

Kyle Matheus - Mérieux NutriSciences – Madison, WI

35

Heidi Wright, Andrew Duss, Andrew Kim & Susan Le– AEMTEK, Inc. – Fremont, CA

36

Allison Mastalerz & Nicole Klass – Microbiology R&D, Q Laboratories Inc., Cincinnati, OH

37

38

We would like to extend a special thanks to the following team members at Q Laboratories, Inc.

39

for their efforts during the collaborative study: Alison DeShields, Dane Brooks, Rebecca Von

40

Handorf, T. Shane Wilson, Jon Clifton, Luke Jett, and Colleen Sweeney.

41

42

We would like to extend special thanks to the members of the QIAGEN Field Service and

43

Logistics teams who ensured that the collaborative study ran smoothly.

44

45

References

46

OMAMAN-36 A : Collaborative Study Manuscript

For ERP Use Only

January 2017

AOAC Research Institute

Expert Review Panel Use Only