Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  305 / 453 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 305 / 453 Next Page
Page Background

QIAGEN

mericon

STEC Workflow Collaborative Study Protocol

May 2016

DRAFT

15

K.

Confirmation

(

a

)

Cultural confirmation of fresh raw ground beef or fresh raw beef trim

.-Follow cultural isolation

and confirmation procedures described in the US Food Safety Inspection Service Microbiology

Laboratory Guidebook (FSIS MLG) 5.09:

Detection, Isolation and Identification of Escherichia coli

O157:H7 from Meat Products and Carcass and Environmental Sponges

for

E. coli

O157:H7 or FSIS MLG

5B.05:

Detection and Isolation of non-O157 Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli (STEC) from Meat

Products and Carcass and Environmental Sponges

for

E. coli

O26, O45, O103, O111, O121 or O145.

6.0

Reporting Raw Data

6.1

Data will be reported using the data reporting form in Appendix 8.2.

6.2

Each collaborator will complete the data reporting form and email it to the co-Study

Director as indicated on the form. Collaborators will either complete the confirmations

or ship samples to QLabs for confirmation. If the latter, the date of shipment shall be

indicated on the data report form.

6.3

Each collaborator or collaboration site must retain all related test results (data sheets

and confirmation results) for a minimum of one year.

6.4

Collaborators may also submit a comment form (Appendix 8.4).

6.5

A table reporting all raw data from all collaborators must be included in the

collaborative study report. All submitted collaborator comments must be included in the

collaborative study report.

7.0

Analyzing Raw Data

7.1

Each concentration level must be analyzed and reported separately. Data may be

excluded due to an assignable cause if sufficient justification is provided.

7.2

Using the AOAC POD Calculator

( http://lcfltd.com/AOAC/aoac-binary-v2-3.xls )

,

determine to following parameters for each contamination level:

7.2.1

Repeatability Standard Deviation -

s

r

7.2.2

Among Laboratories Standard Deviation -

s

L

7.2.3

Homogeneity test of laboratory PODs – p-value

7.2.4

Reproducibility Standard Deviation -

s

R

7.2.5

LPOD

CP

with 95% confidence interval

7.2.6

LPOD

CC

with 95% confidence interval

7.2.7

dLPOD

CP

(LPOD

CP

– LPOD

CC

) with 95% confidence interval

7.2.8

LPOD

C

with 95% confidence interval

7.2.9

LPOD

R

with 95% confidence interval

7.2.10

dLPOD

C

(LPOD

C

- LPOD

R

) with 95% confidence interval

7.3

Compare the p-value from the homogeneity test to 0.1 to determine whether the

variability between laboratories (

s

L

) is significant.

OMAMAN-36 B : Collaborative Study Protocol

For ERP Use Only

January 2017

AOAC Research Institute

Expert Review Panel Use Only