Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  386 / 453 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 386 / 453 Next Page
Page Background

Page

24

of

76

In this study, a single primer probe assay kit lot wasstored at 4 + 1

o

C for 4 and 15 months.

A second set of kits from the same lot was stored at 37 + 1

o

C for 3 and 4.5 months. The

twosets of primer probes stored at 37 + 1

o

C extend the real time aging to approximately 18

and 24 months [9]. The same lot of Master Mix was used for all time points from 0 to 15

months. The 15 month time point kits were assayed once with the original Master Mix and

in parallel with a fresh Master Mix. The study used purified reference DNA diluted from

10,000 to 10 copies per reaction.

For the

mericon

E. Coli O157 Screen Plus stability studies, the reference DNA was a

synthetic E. coli Big 6 gBlock DNA (IDT) containing eae, stx1/stx2 and O157 components.

Aliquots of the gBlock DNA were stored at -20°C, thawed and serially diluted prior to each

test point.

For the

mericon

E. coli STEC O-type stability studies, the reference DNAwas prepared

from E. coli strains O157:H7 (RM-HYG374) and O26 (RM-HYG375) (ifp culture

collection)..The DNA concentration was adjusted to 10,000 copies/µl and stored in aliquots

at -20°C. For testing, an aliquot was thawed and serially diluted prior to each test point.

Results

Inclusivity and Exclusivity Evaluation

Of the 50 inclusivity organisms assessed for both the

mericon

E.coliO157Screen

Plus and

mericon

E.coliSTEC O-Type Pathogen Detection Assays, all were correctly

identified.

.

Similarly, all 30 exclusivity organisms examined using the twoE.coliSTEC

O-Type Pathogen Detection Assays were correctly excluded.

Detailed results for the inclusivity and exclusivity validations are presented in Tables

1 - 4 of the Appendix.

Matrix Study

Results obtained from samples analyzed by the

mericon

methods were statistically

comparable to those analyzed by the FDA/BAM or USDA/FSIS-MLG reference

methods. The POD analysis between

mericon

methods and the reference methods

for all matrixes indicated that there was no significant difference at the 5% level

between the number of positive results by the two methods.

As per criteria outlined in Appendix J of the Official Methods of Analysis Manual,

fractional positive results were obtained [11]. A detailed summary of results for each

matrix is displayed below in Table 5 and Table 6.

The pre-evaluation pathogen screening and aerobic plate count (APC) results are

presented in Table 5 of the Appendix. A summary of the MPN results is presented in

Tables 6A-6C of the Appendix. A detailed summary of results for each matrix is

presented in Tables 7-12 of the Appendix.

OMAMAN-36 E/ AOAC PTM Report

ERP Use Only

January 2017

AOAC Research Institute

Expert Review Panel Use Only