Previous Page  65 / 114 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 65 / 114 Next Page
Page Background

DECEMBER, 1913]

The Gazette of the Incorporated Law Society of Ireland.

61

members of a former outgoing Council had

done the very thing that was objected to by

Sir George Roche.

The statement was challenged by Sir

George Roche and Sir Augustine Baker.

THE PRESIDENT said that if Mr. Brady

had no evidence on the subject he should not

make such a statement. He (the President)

never heard of such' a circular.

MR. BRADY, proceeding, said the only

reason he referred to the matter was to show

that after all there was not very much in this

question of sending out circulars. It was a

matter of taste. He thought every member

should pay at least £1 per annum to the

Society.

As regarded the report of the Statutory

Committee, he thought it redounded to the

honour and credit of the solicitors' profession

of Ireland that the vast majority of the com

plaints that had been made against solicitors

turned out to be bogus.

MR. R. A. MACNAMARA said he thought

the

country

solicitors were

very well

represented on the Council.

The speaker,

dealing with the new rule with reference to

sittings and vacations, said that under that

rule the dates of the commencement and

termination of the sittings in 1914 would be

as follows :—Hilary, llth January to 2nd

April ;

Easter, 16th April to 20th May;

Trinity, 3rd June to 31st July ; and Michael

mas, from 25th October to 21st December.

The Report did not mention that the Council

had also endeavoured to have the Long

Vacation shortened and brought into con

formity with the system in England. For

some reason or another they were not able

to carry that through, but he hoped the new

Council would take up the question. This

was a question in which the public should

assist them, as it was really of more im

portance to the client than the solicitor to

have the Long Vacation shortened. Very

often cases were hampered and delayed by

the Long Vacation (hear, hear).

MR. CRAIG concurred with Mr. Mac-

.namara as regards the suggestion with respect

to the shortening of the Long Vacation. He

suggested that the Assizes might go out at

the end instead of at the beginning of the

Long Vacation, as an arrangement which

might meet the case to a large extent.

MR. LLOYD-BLOOD said that before he

left the Council he introduced this subject

for consideration, ard met with a very hearty

reception, and he hoped it would continue to

receive attention. He knew that there was a

very strong feeling amongst the members of

the Bar in favour of shortening the Long

Vacation (hear, hear). He never heard of the

circular to which Mr. Brady had referred.

MR. HENRY SHANNON said he desired

to congratulate Mr. Cussen and the other new

members of the Council, and he wished them

every success in the coming year. Twelve

months ago he stood in the position of Mr.

Cussen. He was sent up as a representative

from Tipperary, and he was elected on the

Council. He attended the meetings of the

Council as far as he could during the past

twelve months, and from all he could see

country interests came before any other

interests. The Council always gave every

consideration to anything that concerned the

welfare of country practitioners (hear, hear).

He was agreeably surprised to find that, and

he also gradually learned to appreciate the

many difficulties the Council had to contend

with—difficulties which an ordinary member

of the profession could not possibly realise.

He thought it was a poor compliment to pay

to country practitioners to say that they

should be cut down to a subscription of 10s.,

or to say that they would not be able to

afford the full subscription.

It was not

sufficient to support the County Bar and

Sessional Associations.

They must also

support this Society and give it the support

to which it was entitled.

THE PRESIDENT

said

that

before

putting the motion he would like to correct

Mr. Brady in one

particular,

that was

with reference to their exertions in promoting

the County Courts Bill.

It was on the 29th

May

they gave up all hope of getting

anything done in the House of Commons,

in consequence of the statement made by Mr.

Russell for the Chief Secretary. They acted

promptly, and in June applied for a con

ference with the County Court Judges. To

bring about such a conference they had to

apply to the Lord Chancellor. They were not

responsible for any delay. First the June

Sessions came,

then Vacation, and then

Michaelmas Sessions.

The conference took