Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  220-221 / 471 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 220-221 / 471 Next Page
Page Background

s

r

b

0.12

0.09

0.00

0.00

LCL

0.11

0.08

0.00

0.00

UCL

0.16

0.16

0.16

0.16

s

L

c

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

LCL

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

UCL

0.05

0.04

0.16

0.16

s

R

d

0.12

0.09

0.00

0.00

UCL

0.11

0.08

0.00

0.00

LCL

0.14

0.10

0.23

0.23

P

T

e

0.5190

0.4338

1.0000

1.0000

a

Results were not used in statistical analysis due to deviation from testing protocol.

1

c

Repeatability Standard Deviation,

d

Among-Laboratory Standard Deviation,

e

Reproducibility Standard Deviation,

f

P

T

Value =Homogeneity test of laboratory PODs,

f

NA- laboratory results were not received

2

LCL – Lower Confidence Limit; UCL – Upper Confidence Limit

3

Table 2014.2B (cont’d)

: Comparative Results for the Detection of

Listeriamonocytogenes

in Deli Turkey by the 3M

MDA

Listeria monocytogenes

Method vs.

4

the USDA/FSIS-MLG 8.09 Method in a Collaborative Study (Low Level Inoculum)

5

Statistic

MPN/

Test Portion Laboratory

Candidate presumptive

(CP)

Candidate confirmed

(CC)

Candidate result (C)

Reference method

(R)

C vs. R

N

X

POD(CP)

N

X

POD(CC)

N

X

POD(C) N

X POD(R) dLPOD

(C,R)

dLPOD

(CP,CC)

0.66

0.51

0.83

1

12

6

0.50

12

6

0.50

12

6

0.50

12

6

0.50

0.00

0.00

2

12

5

0.42

12

6

0.50

12

5

0.42

12

6

0.50

-0.08

-0.08

3

12

8

0.67

12

8

0.67

12

8

0.67

12

7

0.58

0.08

0.00

4

12

8

0.67

12

9

0.75

12

8

0.67

12

6

0.50

0.17

-0.08

5

b

NA

f

NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA

6

12

6

0.50

12

5

0.42

12

5

0.42

12

7

0.58

-0.16

0.08

7

12

6

0.50

12

6

0.50

12

6

0.50

12

5

0.42

0.08

0.00

8

a

10

7

0.70

10

7

0.70

10

7

0.70

12

6

0.50

0.20

0.00

9

NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA

10

a

12

6

0.50

12

6

0.50

12

6

0.50

12

11

0.92

-0.42

0.00

11

12

4

0.33

12

5

0.42

12

4

0.33

12

6

0.50

-0.17

-0.09

12

b

NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

NA

NA

13

12

5

0.42

12

5

0.42

12

5

0.42

12

5

0.42

0.00

0.00

14

12

8

0.67

12

7

0.58

12

7

0.58

12

7

0.58

0.00

0.09

15

12

5

0.42

12

5

0.42

12

5

0.42

12

7

0.58

-0.16

0.00

16

12

5

0.42

12

5

0.42

12

5

0.42

12

4

0.33

-0.08

-0.00

Estimate

All

132 66

0.50

132 67

0.51

132 64

0.48

132 66

0.50

-0.02

-0.01

Candidates for 2016 Method of the Year

175