222-223 / 471
LCL
0.41
0.42
0.40
0.41
-0.14
-0.13
UCL
0.59
0.60
0.57
0.59
0.11
0.12
s
r
b
0.51
0.51
0.51
0.51
LCL
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
UCL
0.52
0.52
0.52
0.52
s
L
c
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
LCL
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
UCL
0.17
0.17
0.16
0.17
s
R
d
0.51
0.51
0.51
0.51
UCL
0.46
0.46
0.46
0.46
LCL
0.52
0.52
0.52
0.52
P
T
e
0.7565
0.7891
0.8249
0.7565
a
Results were not used in statistical analysis due to deviation from testing protocol.
1
c
Repeatability Standard Deviation,
d
Among-Laboratory Standard Deviation,
e
Reproducibility Standard Deviation,
f
P
T
Value =Homogeneity test of laboratory PODs,
f
NA- laboratory results were not received
2
LCL – Lower Confidence Limit; UCL – Upper Confidence Limit
3
Table 2014.2B (cont’d)
: Comparative Results for the Detection of
Listeriamonocytogenes
in Deli Turkey by the 3M
™
MDA
Listeria monocytogenes
Method vs.
4
the USDA/FSIS-MLG 8.09 Method in a Collaborative Study (High Level Inoculum)
5
Statistic
MPN/
Test Portion Laboratory
Candidate presumptive
(CP)
Candidate confirmed
(CC)
Candidate result (C)
Reference method
(R)
C vs. R
N
X
POD(CP)
N
X
POD(CC)
N
X
POD(C) N
X POD(R) dLPOD
(C,R)
dLPOD
(CP,CC)
5.08
3.39
7.63
1
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
0.00
0.00
2
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
0.00
0.00
3
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
0.00
0.00
4
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
0.00
0.00
5
b
NA
f
NA
NA
NA NA
NA
NA NA
NA
NA NA
NA
NA
NA
6
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
0.00
0.00
7
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
0.00
0.00
8
a
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
0.00
0.00
9
b
NA NA
NA
NA NA
NA
NA NA
NA
NA NA
NA
NA
NA
10
a
12
11
0.92
12
12
1.00
12
11
0.92
12
12
1.00
-0.08
-0.08
11
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
0.00
0.00
12
b
NA NA
NA
NA NA
NA
NA NA
NA
NA NA
NA
NA
NA
13
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
0.00
0.00
14
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
0.00
0.00
15
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
0.00
0.00
16
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
12
12
1.00
0.00
0.00
Candidates for 2016 Method of the Year
176