Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  295 / 822 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 295 / 822 Next Page
Page Background

FREEDOM MOVEMENT

Eternal India

encyclopedia

INTEGRATION OF PRINCELY STATES

Princes must move with times

only hope in doing will of

the people

National Herald, 1, Jan, 1946.

When the rule of the English East India

Company ended in 1858, the British Crown

took over the control of the English empire in

India. Britain's Indian empire comprised

British India, directly under the Crown, and

about 600 Indian states, covering about one-

third of the Indian sub-continent and about

one -fifth of its population, ruled by Indian

Princes. In return for their allegiance to the

British Crown, the British guaranteed the

continued existence of the princely states,

though the real power in these states was

exercised by the British residents and political

agents posted there.

Most of these states were ruled by corrupt

and incompetent individuals, commonly called

maharajas.

They led a life of power, privileges

and pleasure, while their subjects were kept

backward and illiterate, deprived of all civil

liberties and victims of exploitation including

forced labour. These maharajas treated the

states as their personal properties. The British

made use of the maharajas as a divisive force

to frustrate the nationalist movement.

In 1921, the British established the

Chamber of Princes which upheld the princely

privileges. The Chamber of Princes consisted

of 120 princes in all. Normally, the chamber of

princes met once a year and was presided over

by the Viceroy. It elected its own Chancellor

who would preside over its meetings in the

absence of the Viceroy. The people of these

states were drawn into the freedom struggle

and from 1920 onwards they started forming

their own organisations to agitate for

responsible governments and rule of law in the

states.

In Dec. 1927, the representatives of the

states’ people met in Bombay to demand that

Indian states should be regarded as integral

parts of a common Indian nation. They formed

Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel 1875-1950

STATES PEOPLE S

DEMAND

REPRESENTATION

IN ASSEMBLY

National Herald, 28 Jan, 1947.

the All-India States People's Conference which

declared that the people of the states had the

right to determine the form and character of

their governments. The AISPC played a vital

role in creating a country-wide awareness of

the princes' misrule. The movements inside

the states, carried on by the Praja Mandals and

other organisations, were brutally suppressed

by these princes.

In 1928, at its Calcutta session, the

Congress assured the states people of its

sympathy and support in their legitimate

struggle for responsible governments in the

states. In 1938, at Haripura, the Congress

declared that its objective of Puma Swaraj was

for the whole of India inclusive of the states;

but said that the states people's struggle must

be carried on by the people of the states.

During 1938-39, there were outbursts of

mass struggle in Kashmir, Hyderabad, Mysore,

Travancore, Jaipur and many other states, in

which Congressmen participated in large

numbers, and there was an increasing

identification of the nationalist movement for

freedom with the struggles of the states people.

In February 1939, Jawaharlal Nehru presided

over the AISPC session at Ludhiana, and in

March 1939 Gandhiji went on a fast when the

MOST STATES

TO JOIN BY

Aug -15

National Herald, 17, July, 1947.

ruler of Rajkot went back on an agreement he

had reached with Vallabhbhai Patel regarding

the demands of the people of Rajkot.

The credit for the integration of the states

with India goes to Sardar Patel, Lord

Mountbatten and V.P. Menon.

On the suggestion of Sardar Patel the

states ministry was set up and he himself

became its head. An instrument of accession

was drawn up which was acceptable to the

princes. They were required to hand over to

the Indian Union only the subjects of defence,

foreign relations and communications. By

15th Aug. 1947, with the exception of

Junagadh, Hyderabad and Kashmir all the

states had acceded to either India or Pakistan.

Junagadh was a princely state in west

Gujarat bounded by the Arabian Sea on its

west. It had no geographical contiguity with

Pakistan. More than 80% of the people were

Hindus. The Nawab of the state lived a life of

luxury and his chief pre-occupation in life was

dogs of which he had hundred.

Hyderabad was the biggest state in India

with a Muslim ruler, the Nizam, ruling a

population which was 85% Hindu. It had its

own coinage, paper currency and stamps. The

Nizam declared his intention not to join either

India or Pakistan but to become a completely

independent sovereign ruler. He wanted

Dominion status for Hyderabad.

Several rounds of negotiations took place

from January 1948 between Hyderabad and

the Government of India but all proved

unsuccessful.

During the final phase of the negotiations

a draft agreement was drawn up which Lord

Mountbatten, three days before his departure

from India, appealed to the Nizam to accept.

But to no avail.