Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  517 / 822 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 517 / 822 Next Page
Page Background

Eternal India

encyclopedia

EDUCATION

"In presenting this subject to your Lordship, I conceive myself

discharging a solemn duty which I owe to my countrymen, and also

to that enlightened sovereign and legislature which have extended

their benevolent care to this distant land, actuated by a desire to

improve the inhabitants, and therefore humbly trust you will

excuse the liberty I have taken in thus expressing my sentiments to

your Lordship."

STUDY OF ENGLISH

Elphinstone, Governor of Bombay , in his minute of 1823

urged the establishment of schools for teaching English and Euro-

pean sciences. In a communication to the Commissioners for

Indian Affairs, he wrote, " I conceive it is far more important to

impart a high degree of education to the upper classes than to

diffuse a much lower sort of it among the common people. The

most important branch of education is that designed to prepare

natives for public employment. If English could at all be diffused

among persons who had the least time for reflection, the progress

of knowledge by means of it would be to accelerate in a ten-fold

ratio since every man who made himself acquainted with a science

through English would be able to communicate it in his own

language to his countrymen Elphinstone proposed the establish-

ment of a school in Bombay where English might be taught "classi-

cally" and instruction given in that language in history, geography,

and science. In 1833 he set up a similar school in Poona. In 1834

the Elphinstone College was started in Bombay " to train a class of

persons qualified by their intelligence and morality for high em-

ployment in the civil administration of India."

At this time the demand for the study of English had increased

tremendously. English books were in great demand. There was

practically no demand for Sanskrit, Persian and Arabic books.

There was a controversy as to whether instruction should be given

through English or through Sanskrit, Arabic or Persian. The

Anglicists maintained that all instruction should be given through

English. The Orientalists insisted on teaching through the oriental

languages. When Thomas Babington Macaulay, the new Law

Member, was appointed President of the Committee of Public

Instruction in 1834, it was divided equally between the "Anglicists"

and the "Orientalists". The former were for imparting training and

education in English to Indians to Conduct the clerical work of the

company. The latter feared that a switchover to English would

wound Indian sensibilities and lead to a rebellion. Macaulay came

down in favour of the Anglicists with all the knowledge and

eloquence at his command.

Lord Macaulay in his famous minute which argued the case for

English said that "neither as the languages of law nor as the

languages of religion have Sanskrit or Arabic any peculiar claim to

our encouragement. It is possible to make natives of the country

thoroughly good English scholars.

"Are we to keep the people of India ignorant in order that we

may keep them submissive? Or do we think that we can give

knowledge without awakening ambition? Or do we mean to awaken

ambition and provide it with no legitimate vent ? It may be that the

public mind of India may expand under our system until it has

outgrown that system, that by good government we may educate

our subjects into a capacity for better government, that having

become instructed in European knowledge, they may, in some

future age, demand European institutions. Whether such a day will

ever come I know not. Whenever it comes it will be the proudest

day in English history ......... The sceptre may pass away from us,

victory may be inconstant to our arms. But there are triumphs

which are followed by no reverse. There is an empire exempt from

all natural causes of decay. These triumphs are the pacific triumphs

of reason over barbarism ; the empire is the imperishable empire

of our arts and our morals, our literature and our laws.

" The question before us is simply whether , when it is in our

power to teach this language- English- we shall teach languages in

which by universal confession, there are no books on any subjects

which deserve to be compared to our own ; whether , when we can

teach European science, we shall teach systems which, by univer-

sal confession, whenever they differ from those of Europe, differ

for the worse ; and whether, when we patronise sound philosophy

and true history, we shall countenance at the public expense,

medical doctrines which would disgrace an English farrier, astron-

omy which would move laughter in the girls at an English boarding

school, history abounding with kings thirty feet high and reigns

thirty thousand years long, and geography made up of seas of

treacle and seas of butter."

Lord William Bentinck, the Governor-General, approved of

the minute of Lord Macaulay. A resolution was passed on March

7th

1835

that "while the colleges of oriental learning were not to

be abolished ........ all funds at the disposal of the Government of

India would henceforth be spent in imparting to the Indians a

knowledge of English literature and science."

English education received an impetus when the Governor-

General, Lord Hardinge, introduced a regulation that all public

posts would be filled by an open competitive examination, prefer-

ence being given to those with a knowledge of English. English

education became the passport to higher appointments for Indians.

But little was done to improve the system of primary education in

vernacular schools for the masses. Disproportionate attention was

paid to the middle-class gentry. The vernacular schools were in a

miserable condition.

A more ominous result was the effect of the new system on

relations between Hindus and Muslims. The advantages of

English education were reaped mostly by the middle class Hindus,

who flocked to the government and missionary schools. The

Muslims remained aloof. They resented the displacement of Per-

sian by English as the language of government and administration.

As time passed the cultural and economic gap between the two

communities widened.

Although the momentous decision of

1835

marked the begin-

ning of English education, the evolution of a comprehensive and

co-ordinated system of education took place only in

1854

during

the revision of the company's charter. A parliamentary committee

that was appointed to examine the whole subject resulted in the

memorable Despatch of Sir Charles Wood, President of the Board

of Control, to the court of Directors in

1854

which has been

described as the "Magna Carta of English education in India." It

laid the foundation on which the educational system in British

India subsequently developed.