Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  6 / 88 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 6 / 88 Next Page
Page Background

Environment and Security

The geographical focus of this report used

to be a classical hinterland. For a long peri-

od in history the area was even called Tran-

scaspia, in other words the land behind the

Caspian Sea. Also from the perspective of

the now independent former Soviet Repub-

lics Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan the strip

of land bordering the Caspian Sea is a dis-

tant province remote from the capitals.

But things are changing. The geopolitical

centre of gravity has shifted east and with

the rapid development of China’s economy,

another pole has emerged, rendering the

terms ‘trans’, ‘hinter’ or ‘behind’ invalid for

this region. And with the rapid develop-

ments linked to oil and gas exploration in

Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan, the sleepy

provinces along the coast are waking up.

Aktau, for instance, has become a boom-

town by international standards.

Now this assessment puts the region centre

stage, where it belongs. What are the impacts

of these tremendous dynamics on the envi-

ronment, and, going one step further, can en-

vironmental issues, such as pollution on land

and sea, desertification, species extinction

be a threat to security? What are the poten-

tial impacts of climate change? Would these

threats be confined to the region or would

they affect much larger areas? Or does the

environment build bridges, does it connect?

This set of relatively simple questions

serves as the guiding principle for how the

environment and security initiative works.

Both Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan joined

the ENVSEC club early on and asked for as-

sistance in addressing common issues of

environment and security, outlining possible

solutions, and communicating the findings

in a way that can be understood by a larger

public both in and outside the region and its

constituencies.

This publication is the result of more than

three years of intensive work done by Ka-

zakhstan, Turkmenistan and international

organisations: first diplomatic, then more

hands-on environmental assessments in-

cluding field work and consultations, writing

texts and making maps and graphics. Con-

sidering the perceived sensitivity of some

of the topics the report was dealing with,

further diplomatic efforts have deployed to

ensure that countries agreed about the key

outcomes of the document. After all, there is

no more hinterland, in the traditional sense,

east of the Caspian Sea.

Hinterkaspien