Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  11 / 88 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 11 / 88 Next Page
Page Background

Eastern Caspian

11

Environment and Security

actions, and transnational river basins, insta-

bility related to environmental degradation

can contribute to conflict development (Bae-

chler, 1999).

When discussing the importance of environ-

mental and demographic factors in modern

conflict, academic research points out that

the

loss of livelihoods

is, to a greater extent than

poverty, the common denominator for many

recent internal conflicts.

Ohlsson (2005) argues that “while poverty may

be a near-endemic condition in certain socie-

ties, loss of livelihoods marks a rapid transi-

tion from a previous stable condition of relative

welfare into a condition of poverty or destitu-

tion”.

It is the rapid process of change result-

ing in a sudden fall into poverty that creates

the potential for livelihood conflicts

. Losses of

livelihoods have many causes in the contem-

porary world, most of them being related to

job scarcity, population increase, and degra-

dation of key environmental resources.

Scarcity can arise either when the quality and

quantity of resources decreases (

supply-in-

duced scarcity

), population grows (

demand-

induced scarcity

) and/or resource access

becomes more unequal (

structural scarcity

)

(Homer-Dixon, 1999). The UN Secretary-Gen-

eral, Ban Ki-Moon, corroborated the scarcity

hypothesis during the recent Security Council

debate on the impact of climate change, say-

ing that “when resources are scarce – whether

energy, water or arable land – our fragile eco-

systems become strained, as do the coping

mechanisms of groups and individuals. This

can lead to a breakdown of established codes

of conduct, and even outright conflict”

2

.

Changes in the natural environment affect

human societies and their survival capaci-

ties. Recent reports underline the fact that

changes in climatic conditions “will over-

stretch many societies’ adaptive capacities

within the coming decades. This could result

in destabilization and violence, jeopardizing

national and international security” (WBGU,

2007:1). Such changes could exacerbate ex-

isting environmental crises such as drought,

water scarcity and soil degradation, and

intensify existing problems. Weak and frag-

ile states are more exposed to the risks in-

duced by climate change as their capacity to

adapt may be rapidly overstrained and lead

to increased instability (WBGU, 2007).

Another approach in research has been to

consider that dependence on natural re-

sources, as measured by the percentage

of GDP stemming from primary commodity

exports, increases the risk of conflict (Col-

lier et al., 2003). Recent analysis (Kahl, 2006)

shows the importance of going beyond the

abundance versus scarcity dichotomy. This

is particularly true in the case of abundant

energy resources, in high demand in national

and global markets. Hence in an increasingly

interdependent world, abundance and scar-

city of resources need to be put into their

context to understand how they become

factors of security or insecurity.

Livelihood definition

A livelihood comprises the capabilities, assets

(stores, resources, claims, and access) and ac-

tivities required for a means of living.

(Chambers and Conway, 1992)