105 / 334
D
Corporate Responsibility
D.6
Information about the report
Atos
|
Registration Document 2016
105
D
Alignment with Global reporting initiative G4 guidelines
D.6.1.3
[G4-6], [G4-15], [G4-18], [G4-20], [G4-21], [G4-23], [G4-28], [G4-29], [G4-32], [G4-47] and [G4-48]
review the prioritization of its sustainable issues and its strategic
axes.
material assessment performed in 2014, which had confirmed
the most relevant topics (aligned with G4 aspects) in order to
In 2016, Atos consolidated the results from the extensive
well as its link with targets set by the Group.
importance of each challenge in relation to its significance for
Atos business strategy, its relationship to existing regulations as
Interviews are yearly conducted in order to evaluate the
members of the Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability
Program and approved by the Group Executive Committee.
Material issues and new strategic axes are validated by the
restructures the strategic axes into four main focus areas
according to these priorities.
Nevertheless, it helped the Group to focus on more specific
This global review in 2016 confirmed that the issues previously
identified in Atos sustainability strategic axes were still relevant.
The materiality matrix presented in D.1.3.2 better emphasizes
the prioritization of Atos corporate responsibility challenges and
more precise and better connected to its specific activities and
challenges than the Global Reporting Initiative-defined aspects.
subjects and to reprioritize some aspects within this strategy. In
this context, Atos decided to redesign its materiality matrix to be
are accurate and exhaustive in line with the GRI-G4
requirements.
Atos reports on the full general disclosures and a total of 38
Performance Indicators clustered into management disclosures
successfully completed the GRI Content Index Service. Atos aims
to demonstrate that the extra financial performance disclosures
2016 Corporate Responsibility Integrated report ‘In accordance’
with the GRI G4 Guidelines “Comprehensive” option. Atos has
decent work, human rights, society, product responsibility) plus
8 specific Atos Performance indicators. Atos has produced its
and six categories (economic, environment, labor practices &
Atos has applied the “Guidance on Defining Report Content”
following the Principles of Materiality, Stakeholder Inclusiveness,
Sustainability Context and Completeness.
perimeter has changed compared to 2015. Detailed explanations
are provided in next paragraphs.
2016 to December 31, 2016 in a comparable period (one year)
to the previous 2015 report. In term of scope the geographical
Atos is committed to transparent and public reporting on
sustainability. This report covers the period from January 1,
Anthelio, the Company recently acquired by Atos, is not taken
into account as part of the Corporate Responsibility reporting
scope.
Process for defining report content
D.6.1.4
assessment (See section D.1.3.3). Corporate Responsibility
follow up.
strategy includes a prioritization of topics which is an essential
requirement for our performance dashboard and internal project
The selection of the corporate responsibility challenges and KPIs
is aligned with Atos business strategy and based on a materiality
required profile information and an overview of the management
approach for each indicator category is also provided.
Responsibility Report. It states which subjects have been
considered applicable and then included in the report. The
The GRI Content Index table can be found in the Corporate
[G4-17]
Aspects Boundaries
within the organization. Outside the organization, these aspects
are material for the mentioned stakeholders.
overall Atos organization at the exception of the “product
responsibility compliance” aspect, which is only material for Bull
The following aspects of GRI 4 are material for the Group for the