Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  110 / 334 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 110 / 334 Next Page
Page Background

D

Corporate Responsibility

D.6

Information about the report

Trusted partner for your Digital Journey

110

Detailed information related to AO2

calculation method has been changed for the Trust Index. In

2016 a weighted average of the scores is provided by taking into

This indicator is based on the Great Place to Work survey. After

recommendation by the Great Place to Work Institute, the

country. For that reason this value is not comparable to previous

years (until 2015 it was an arithmetical average).

account the number of people answering the GPTW survey by

ISO 27001 Audits

mergers & acquisitions, not all sites will be ready for inclusion

an external 27001 audit in the reported year. All Atos worldwide

sites with greater than 50 staff are in scope, however due to

number of on-boarded sites that have passed an external 27001

audit and the number of already certified sites that have passed

The percentage coverage of ISO 27001 audits demonstrates the

and are therefore waiting to be on- boarded [AO3].

Detailed information related to AO17 and G4-SO3

percentage of operations assessed for risks related to corruption

and the significant risks identified).

environment. Atos works with Ecovadis to assess strategic

suppliers risks related to corruption (G4-SO3: Total number and

AO17 information contains data provided by Ecovadis. Ecovadis

assessment is not only on corruption, but also on HR and

The data is not comparable with the result of previous years as

the definition of strategic supplier was changed to reflect the

the new three year plan Atos is focusing on the top 250 vendors

which represent circa 70% of the total spend.

Atos procurement supplier consolidation strategy. According to

revenues spent).

Number of suppliers assessed by Ecovadis during the current

year out of the Strategic suppliers (representing 80% of

AO17_A_c0 Number of strategic suppliers assessed by Ecovadis:

EcoVadis = Number of ATOS’s strategic suppliers evaluated by

AO17_A_c1 Percentage of strategic suppliers evaluated by

EcoVadis / number of ATOS’s strategic suppliers.

suppliers).

AO17_A_c2 Total spend evaluated by EcoVadis (EUR) = Total

spend assessed by Ecovadis (regardless if spent on strategic

Total spend assessed by EcoVadis / global ATOS spend during

the year.

AO17_A_c3 Total percentage of spend assessed by EcoVadis =

Detailed information related to AO7

a dedicated person at Group level. Atos portfolio continually

evolves and the KPI definitions are subject to updates.

sustainability, yet some impacts that are difficult to assess may

not be taken into account. The overall process is coordinated by

and compliance provided by the offering). This methodology

assesses the main positive impacts of ATOS’s offers in terms of

(regrouping economic benefits, social impact and human being,

environmental footprint and climate change, governance trust

Managers based on the screening of offerings on 24 aspects

oriented offers are identified and the associated indexes

(degrees of sustainability) are set by Atos Group Solution

revenues are multiplied by an index that assesses the degree of

sustainability within each offer (from 20%-100%). Sustainability

supported by our Digital Payments and e-Transactions &

Cybersecurity technologies across all Atos offerings. These

experience for its customers: Atos Canopy Hybrid Cloud, SAP

HANA by Atos, Atos Digital Workplace and Atos Codex,

revolves around our Digital Transformation Factory; a portfolio

of 4 end-to-end offerings which solicits all of Atos expertise and

oriented offers that Atos sells to its clients. Atos growth strategy

AO7 KPI is calculated based on the revenues of the sustainability

KPI AO7 - 2016

Revenue (inMEuros)

AO7_a1 CODEX

450

AO7_a2 CLOUD

490

AO7_a8 DIGITAL WORKPLACE

90

AO7_a11 SAP HANA

55

AO7_b0_WL

585

TOTAL SUSTAINABLE REVENUE ESTIMATED

1,670

Grenelle 2 information

Detailed information for the no reporting of some

environment-related risks: it is not reliable compared to the

activity sector.

The amount of the provisions and guarantees for

do not have a significant or critical impact on other forms of

Noise affects or any other form of specific pollution: Materiality

matrix assessment has highlighted that Atos Group operations

need to be taken in this area.

pollution including noise nuisances for instance. As a

consequence, no relevant and appropriate actions or measures