Previous Page  111 / 328 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 111 / 328 Next Page
Page Background

as too lenient, and those who thought the penal]

system was too harsh. The three necessary elementsl

in punishment were Deterrence

(discouraging

others), Retribution (a link between the heinousness

of the crime and the severity of the punishment)

and Restitution (Restoring to a victim as far as

possible what has been taken away). As Pope Pius

XII said, retributive punishment should help towards

rehabilitation, yet one cannot be rehabilitated until

one recognises one's sin. While the prisoner should

be prepared to accept the justice of the punishment,

at the same time the judges and the public should

identify themselves more actively with the future of

the prisoner. The Chief Justice thought that, in

assessing punishment, judges were laymen and that

as far as possible they should interest themselves in

the future welfare of the prisoners whom they have

sentenced ;

the community should help ex-prisoners

in securing employment. It was disturbing that on

the whole imprisonment had no beneficial effect on

prisoners ; perhaps the idea of a week-end prison to

enable prisoners to purge short term sentences could

be considered. On the Continent, the injured party

could take an action for damages for murder, and a

study of penology by law students should be actively

considered.

Mr. Edward Fahy, B.L., stated that he knew from

personal experience that the best detectives in Dublin

had left the force, and that consequently the number

of crimes now detected had diminished considerably.

The major cause of juvenile delinquency was lack of

parental control, and this applied as much to rich as

to poor parents. When visiting the Malone Institute,

Belfast, he had been impressed by the letters which

the ex-borstal boys had written to the Governor.

Dr. Keith Simpson stressed that many habitual

criminals were mental patients who required essential

treatment. In the Welfare State, too many people had

obtained big pay packets who did not know how to

make the best use of the money.

Dr. Eustace, Rev. Professor O'Doherty, Dr.

Meenan and Mr. Donough O'Donovan also spoke.

Mr. Justice Murnaghan, in summing up, stated that

in most cases the mental condition of the prisoner

towards his punishment was inalterable. In his view

the prevalence of divorce in England had lowered the

moral outlook of the people, and was responsible

for the great increase in crime. The practical applic

ation of imposing punishment was the most difficult

task a judge had to perform, as so many factors, such

as the effect on the prisoner's family, had to be

considered.

APPELLATE PROCEDURE IN ENGLAND

" The Times " for Friday March 23rd reports that

the Master of the Rolls presiding in the Court of

Appeal announced that in view of comments by

United States jurists on the English appellate system

immediate steps would be taken by way of experiment

to reduce the time taken in the hearing of appeals by

the court. For the purposes of the experiment each

member of the court will have read (i) the pleadings

or the originating summons (or their equivalent),

(2) the order under appeal, (3) the notice of appeal

and respondent's notice (if any) and (4) the judgment

of the trial judge together with ?ny cases cited by

him in his judgment. It was proposed to introduce

the experiment in connection with the appeals

tribunal list on the following week. The proposal

was made with the full support of the Lord Chancellor

and representatives of the Bar and the Law Society

had been consulted. The visiting American jurists

had drawn attention to the length of time so fre

quently taken up in the court by the reading of

documents, including the judgment under appeal

and the cases therein cited, and it had been pointed

out that the result must often be substantially to

increase the costs. It was not, however, intended to

fetter in any way the right of counsel to full oral

argument of their cases. (See also [1962] i All E.R.

897).

CHARITIES ACT, 1961

The attention of members is drawn to the following

important provisions of the Act:—

Ci) In the Schedule to the Act, the whole of the

Charitable Donations and Bequests ("Ireland) Act

1844 is repealed as from the ist July, 1961 ;

this

includes

inter alia

Section 16, and it is therefore no

longer necessary to make use of an " O'Hagan

clause " in a will in order that a charitable donation

or devise will be valid if made within three months

of the death of the testator.

(2) Under Section 29 of the Charities Act 1961,

the powers given to the Commissioners to frame

cy-pres schemes in cases where the charitable inten

tion of the testator cannot be carried out are con

siderably widened ;

the Commissioners may hence

forth direct this intention to be carried out with due

regard to the spirit of the gift, if the charitable gift

does not exceed £5,000 and for this purpose the

value of the land is to be taken as 50 times the poor

law valuation.

(3) Under Section 32 of the 1961 Act, the Com

missioners are henceforth given power to invest

charity funds under their control in securities not

authorised by law or not authorised by the trust

instrument, and the Commissioners may permit

ordinary charity trustees to do likewise. Investments

of charity funds however will be confined generally

to Irish securities.