Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  18 / 188 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 18 / 188 Next Page
Page Background

16

difference between mass and lean is the understanding how to increase the productivity.

Meanwhile, mass production focuses on the “producing more” principle to reach

minimum unit costs (production value added) through the economies of scale. Lean

production focuses on the “consuming less” principle observing the reduction of the

total costs (production, logistics value added and production, logistics waste).

Standard cost accounting leads to minimisation of unit costs of particular chains

in the supply chain. Concrete goals of the chains in the supply chain are then set based

on the sum of costs and goals of the related cost centres rather than as a reflection of

customer requirements. Today, cost accounting is in this matter more anti-lean as it is

incapable of identifying positive effects of lean such as productivity growth and cost

reduction (see Figure 1.7).

Figure 1.7 Differences in cost allocation in mass and lean [31]

The inaccurate perception of productivity, explained in the previous paragraph,

considers as productive whatever is produced rather than only what is demanded, which

causes a highly inaccurate allocation of costs. Lean SCM involves a system view so its

aim is to reduce the cost of the complex. Therefore, activities causing waste have the

same importance as those adding value. The benefits of lean could only be made visible

when the cost of wasting is identified and calculated (see Figure 1.7, lean SCM – batch

production). Unit cost of wasting has to be considered in today’s cost accounting so that

the waste could be made visible [31].

The previous three changes require the new attitude to management of supply

chains. Functional management is focused on insular optimisation of single departments

or chains. On the other hand, process management enables optimisation of total affects

which are also dependent not only on cost accounting of performances of related

departments but also on evaluation of productivity and the capacity of optimisation

itself. Management of the particular parts built on planning, organising and control