Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  162 / 561 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 162 / 561 Next Page
Page Background

INFORMS Nashville – 2016

162

MB42

207D-MCC

Crowd-Commerce Applications in Operations and

Revenue Management

Sponsored: Revenue Management & Pricing

Sponsored Session

Chair: Rene A Caldentey, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL,

United States,

rene.caldentey@chicagobooth.edu

Co-Chair: Yifan Feng, The University of Chicago, 5807 S Woodlawn

Ave, Chicago, IL, 60637, United States,

yfeng4@chicagobooth.edu

1 - Learning Customer Preferences Through Crowdvoting

Yifan Feng, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637,

United States,

yfeng4@chicagobooth.edu

, Rene A Caldentey,

Christopher Ryan

We study a seller introducing a new product with multiple potential product

designs into the marketplace. In order to pick the design that is most likely to be

preferred by customers, the seller uses an online system that allows potential

buyers to vote for their preferred designs. We study how to dynamically

customize each individual voter’s choice set, in order to most efficiently learn

overall customer preferences. We propose an algorithm that balances breadth of

choice and accuracy in determining the best product. We show this algorithm is

asymptotically optimal in speed of learning.

2 - Simultaneous Vs. Sequential Crowdsourcing Contests

Lu Wang, University of Toronto, Rotman School of Management,

105 St George Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 3E6, Canada,

lu.wang12@rotman.utoronto.ca,

Ming Hu

In a crowdsourcing contest, innovation is outsourced to an open crowd. We

consider two alternative crowdsourcing mechanisms for an innovative product

involving multiple attributes. One is to run a simultaneous contest, where the

best is selected from the single solution simultaneously submitted by each

contestant. The other is to run multiple sequential sub-contests, with each

dedicated to one attribute and a later sub-contest built on the best outcome from

earlier sub-contests. While both mechanisms have their own advantages, either

could win over depending on situations.

3 - Contests And Inequality

Mohamed Mostagir, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI,

United States,

mosta@umich.edu

, Yesim Orhun,

Hamidreza Tavafoghi

Contests are one of the standard mechanisms that firms employ to extract the

most effort from participants, whether these participants are crowd workers or

the firm’s own personnel. We study contests that are repeatedly played by the

same agents, with a focus on how information revelation about past play impacts

future efforts. We show that such revelation can be detrimental to aggregate

effort, and discuss how regulations (e.g. the SEC Dodd-Frank act) that require

employers to reveal wages in an attempt to curb inequality can lead to

unexpected effects that ultimately result in higher inequality amongst workers in

environments that resemble contests, i.e. where wages follow a rank-based

structure.

MB43

208A-MCC

Applied Decision Analysis

Sponsored: Decision Analysis

Sponsored Session

Chair: Saurabh Bansal, Penn State University, Penn State University,

State College, PA, 16802, United States,

sub32@psu.edu

1 - Analyzing Both The Cost And Strategic Value Of Sustainable

Supply Chains

Jason Merrick, Virginia Commonwealth University,

jrmerric@vcu.edu

, Paul Brooks, Lance Saunders

The Brazilian government will require the use of additives in all gasoline fuel

starting in 2017. We use optimization modeling to help our industry partner

design their new supply chain network and study the cost of reducing carbon

emissions. However, we then use decision analysis to study the strategic value of

sustainable supply chain designs in obtaining market share. In our case study, the

strategic value outweighs the cost of reducing emissions.

2 - Eliciting Newsvendor Quantile: Direct Or

Decomposed Assessments?

Saurabh Bansal, Penn State,

sub32@psu.edu

We consider the newsvendor problem that is commonly used in practice. We

report the results of a laboratory study in which participants provide (i) direct

solution to the problem, (ii) decomposed solution to the problem. Our results

help identify the optimal discretion levels that should be provided to managers.

3 - Supporting The Prioritization Of Emerging Animal Health Threats

For The UK Department Of Agriculture With Decision Analysis

Gilberto Montibeller, Loughborough University, Loughborough,

United Kingdom,

g.montibeller@lboro.ac.uk

Gilberto Montibeller, Decision Consulting Ltd., Leicester, United

Kingdom,

g.montibeller@lboro.ac.uk

, L. Alberto Franco

Emerging animal health threats pose serious risk to humans and countries, and

represent a serious challenge for both analysts and policy makers. We employed a

decision analytic framework to develop a risk management support system to

help the UK Department of Agriculture (DEFRA) with the prioritisation of such

threats, providing an effective mechanism for ranking them and supporting the

design of policy recommendations. The system is supporting the

recommendations of DEFRA’s Veterinary Risk Management group since 2009.

Benefits for the client include increased rigour in evidence gathering, transparent

assessments, and a traceable and more streamlined decision process.

4 - How Did We Integrate Optimization And Machine Learning In our

Solution Tool at Mckinsey

Halil I Cobuloglu, Sr. Research Analyst, McKinsey & Company,

404 Wyman Street, Waltham, MA, 02451, United States,

halil.cobuloglu@gmail.com

, Dimitris Bertsimas,

Nathan Uhlenbrock, Prodipto Ghosh

In this project, we have developed a territory optimization tool for our clients. In

order to reach solution fast, we have integrated various algorithms including

machine learning and optimization techniques in our model. This tool helps

companies efficiently use their limited sources and optimize their territories with

more balanced workload.

MB44

208B-MCC

Panel: Advice from Award Winning Researchers

Sponsored: Decision Analysis

Sponsored Session

Moderator: Andrea Hupman Cadenbach, University of Missouri -

St. Louis, St Louis, MO, United States,

cadenbach@umsl.edu

This panel discussion features several distinguished researchers who have won

awards from the Decision Analysis Society. Panelists will discuss the processes

behind their research that contributed to their success and share advice for junior

faculty, postdoctoral researchers, and PhD candidates.

1 - Panelist

L Robin Keller, Professor, University of California - Irvine,

Irvine, CA, United States,

LRKeller@uci.edu

2 - Panelist

James S Dyer, University of Texas - Austin,

j.dyer@mccombs.utexas.edu

3 - Panelist

Robert Clemen, Duke University,

clemen@duke.edu

4 - Panelist

Ali E Abbas, Professor and Director of DECIDE, University of

Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, United States,

aliabbas@usc.edu

MB42