Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  209 / 561 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 209 / 561 Next Page
Page Background

INFORMS Nashville – 2016

209

2 - Implementationof The Genetic Gain Performance Metric

Accelerates Agricultural Productivity

Joseph Byrum, Syngenta, West Des Moines, IA, 50265, United

States,

joseph.byrum@syngenta.com

, Craig Davis, Greg Doonan,

Tracy Doubler, Bill Beavis, Von Kaster, Sam Parry, Ronald Mowers

Yield is the most important metric for a farmer, as crop output directly impacts

profitability. We now refer to the rate of increase in the genetic potential for yield

in cultivars as “genetic gain,” and it is measured in bushels per acre (bu/ac). The

challenge was to develop models and methods that provide unbiased estimates of

the genetic components of yield for unbalanced field trials conducted across years.

An algorithm was implemented that minimizes the confounding influence of

unpredictable environmental contributions to estimated yields of varieties

enabling real-time unbiased estimation of performance metrics that are used in

operational decision making and optimization.

MD04

101D-MCC

Optimization for Enhancing Critical

Infrastructure Resilience

Sponsored: Energy, Natural Res & the Environment,

Energy I Electricity

Sponsored Session

Chair: Feng Qiu, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Avenue,

Lemont, IL, 60439, United States,

fqiu@anl.gov

Co-Chair: Matteo Spada, Paul Scherrer Institut, OHSA/D19, 5232

Villigen PSI, Villigen PSI, Switzerland,

matteo.spada@psi.ch

1 - A Framework For Measuring Infrastructure Resilience Of Energy

Systems Taking Natural Hazards And Technical Failures As

Disruption Triggers

Peter Lustenberger, Paul Scherrer Institut/ETH Zurich, Singapore,

Singapore,

lustenberger@frs.ethz.ch,

Tianyin Sun, Patrick Gasser,

Wansub Kim, Peter Burgherr, Matteo Spada, Stefan Hirschberg

This work first provides a quantifiable and feasible technical resilience definition

and measure specifically for energy systems. Following this definition, we propose

a framework for measuring the technical resilience of both the components

(power plants, substations, refineries, compressor stations etc.) and the network

topology of power grid and oil/gas supply systems by considering probabilistic

disruption triggers of both natural hazards and technical failures as well as

recovery dynamics.

2 - Prioritization Of Infrastructure Resilience Investments

Julia Phillips, Argonne National Laboratory,

phillipsj@anl.gov

Recent events emphasize the importance of the protection and resilience of

systems of critical infrastructure. This talk explores initial research on

prioritization of infrastructure investments for resilience through optimization

considering owner risk profiles. It is hypothesized that owners of different types of

critical infrastructure systems may let their risk tendencies influence how to

allocate funds as opposed to what investments are “optimal” considering

monetary value only. The research community has struggled with the

measurement of resilience. We use a technique of perceived value to assist in

measurement of resilience and prioritization of investment funds.

3 - Wind-participated Power System Restoration

Feng Qiu, Argonne National Laboratory,

fqiu@anl.gov

Black-start resources, electric generators that can start on their own without

power supply from the grid, are critical initial power sources for power system

restoration. Wind generation, with black-start capability, however, has not been

considered as black-start resources due to its unreliability (variable and

uncertain). As the wind integration continues to grow, wind-participated system

restoration becomes not only a viable but also a valuable solution. In this talk, we

will present an optimization model to incorporate wind in the system restoration.

Wind uncertainty and variability will be addressed to ensure the success of system

restoration.

4 - Repair, Rebuild, Or Replace? Protecting Aging Infrastructure From

Hazards And Threats

David L. Alderson, Naval Postgraduate School,

dlalders@nps.edu,

Jan Brendecke, Kyle Y Lin

We consider an infrastructure system whose function depends on a number of

components that fail randomly according to known rates. Components that are

“new” have a small failure rate and components that are “old” have a larger

failure rate. When a component fails it can be replaced to “new” status or

repaired to “old” status. An “old” component can also be proactively replaced to

“new” status. We formulate and solve a Markov decision process to identify the

optimal replace/repair policies for given system operating costs and discuss

implications for real infrastructure systems.

MD05

101E-MCC

Power System Generation and

Transmission Expansion

Sponsored: Energy, Natural Res & the Environment,

Energy I Electricity

Sponsored Session

Chair: Enzo E Sauma, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Vicuña

Mackenna 4860, Macul., Santiago, 7820436, Chile,

esauma@ing.puc.cl

1 - Risk-averse Transmission And Generation Planning:

Wecc Case Study

Francisco Munoz, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez,

elpanchomunoz@gmail.com

, Harry van der Weijde, Benjamin

Field Hobbs, Jean-Paul Watson

We investigate the effects of risk aversion on optimal transmission and

generation expansion planning in a competitive market. To do so, we formulate a

stochastic model which minimizes a weighted average of expected transmission

and generation costs and their conditional value at risk (CVaR), and which can be

shown to have an equivalent solution to a perfectly competitive risk-averse

Stackelberg equilibrium in which a risk-averse transmission planner maximizes

welfare after which risk-averse generators maximize profits.

2 - How Technical Operational Details Affect Generation Expansion In

Oligopolist Markets

Efraim Centeno, Universidad Pontificia Comillas - IIT,

Efraim.Centeno@iit.comillas.edu

, Sonja Wogrin, Adelaida Nogales

We propose a generation expansion model including an oligopolistic market

representation based on an equilibrium approach. We incorporate the system

states methodology into this generation expansion model allowing us to recover

some chronological information in a LDC framework, thereby more accurately

accounting for start-up and shut-down costs without making use of an hourly

representation of demand. We find that when operational details are considered,

flexible technologies are preferred by the companies in the optimal mix. We also

observe that under perfect competition in comparison with oligopolistic markets,

more base-load plants are built as well as more peaking plants.

3 - Sustainable Transmission Planning In Imperfectly Competitive

Electricity Industries: Balancing Economic Efficiency And

Environmental Outcomes

Afzal S. Siddiqui, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden,

Afzal S. Siddiqui, HEC Montréal, Montréal, QC, H3T 2A7, Canada,

afzal.siddiqui@ucl.ac.uk,

Makoto Tanaka, Yihsu Chen

We address the problem of a TSO that builds a transmission line in order to

maximise social welfare inclusive of the cost of emissions. A TSO in a deregulated

industry can only indirectly influence outcomes via its choice of the transmission

line capacity. Via a bi-level model, we show that this results in less transmission

capacity with limited emissions control if industry is perfectly competitive. A

carbon tax on industry leads to perfect alignment of incentives and maximised

social welfare only under perfect competition. By contrast, a carbon tax actually

lowers social welfare under a Cournot oligopoly as the resulting reduction in

consumption facilitates the further exercise of market power.

4 - Power Capacity Expansion Planning And The Influence Of

Network Payment Schemes

Enzo Sauma, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile,

esauma@ing.puc.cl

, Diego Bravo, Javier Contreras,

Sebastián de la Torre, José Aguado, David Pozo

We propose a multi-annual transmission expansion planning model seeking to

reduce the total system costs and considering different network payment

schemes. The proposed models are reformulated as Mixed Integer Linear

Programming (MILP) problems. A realistic case study based on the main power

system in Chile is analyzed to illustrate the proposed models. It is shown that

integrating line cost-recovering equations into the Transmission Expansion

Planning model may result into a more realistic and less congested power

network. Also, total system cost is highly related with transmission tariff

discrimination.

MD05