Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  257 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 257 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S244

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Recent studies highlight the relevance of DNA repair

defects in genome instability and tumour development.

Little is known about the impact of DNA repair aberrations

on patient prognosis or treatment outcome. However, new

targeted treatment options, such as PARP inhibitors, can

exploit these repair defects if present. Here we tested

whether gene expression analysis could identify DNA

repair defects, with the ultimate aim to determine an

association with clinical outcome and identify patients for

targeted treatments.

Material and Methods

Mitomycin C (MMC) or PARP inhibitor olaparib

hypersensitivity is a hallmark of functional homologous

recombination (HR) or Fanconi anaemia (FA) pathway DNA

repair defects. We determined whole transcriptome

expression and sensitivity to MMC and olaparib in a panel

of 28 patient derived head and neck squamous cell

carcinoma (HNSCC) cell lines. Based on their sensitivity

(IC50 values), cell lines were classified as

Normal (N)

,

hypersensitive to both drugs (

MOS

) or hypersensitive to

mitomycin C but not olaparib (

MS

). To esta blish a “DNA

repair defect” signature, relevant genes were extracted

by differential expression analysis and used as input to

various machine learning algorithms. Performance was

evaluated using 20 repetitions of 5-fold int ernal cross

validation.

Probabilities of defects calculated by these m odels were

used in a multivariate cox proportional hazard model to

determine their prognostic capacity in a cohort of 84

HNSCC tumours, treated with chemo-radiation, and the

TCGA HNSCC cohort.

Results

Expression analysis of the three groups yielded genes

enriched for targets of transcription factors involved in

DNA damage response, including p53, demonstrating its

relevance to the system under study. The random forest

model performed best, achieving a high sensitivity of 0.91

and specificity of 0.86.

We validated our model in the Cancer Genome Project

dataset of drug sensitivities in cell lines. The predicted

repair defected groups had significantly lower IC50 values

for DNA damage inducing agents, including cisplatin (MS:

p=5.9e-05; MOS: p=0.042).

Encouraged by this data, we used our model in the patient

data sets. Increased probabilities of DNA repair defects

were associated with increased mortality, recurrence and

disease progression in chemo-radiated patients with

advanced tumours in our cohort (shown in figure) and with

survival in the TCGA HNSCC cohort.

Conclusion

We developed a model that exposes DNA repair defects

as it predicts hypersensitivity to DNA crosslinking agents

caused by such defects

in vitro

. The model successfully

predicted sensitivity in an independent dataset. We found

that increased probabilities of DNA repair defects were

associated with poorer outcome in patients, possibly a

result of the impact on genomic instability.

Proffered Papers: Highlights of proffered papers

OC-0464 Validation of a fully automatic real-time liver

motion monitoring method on a conventional linac

J. Bertholet

1

, R. Hansen

1

, E.S. Worm

1

, J. Toftegaard

1

, H.

Wan

2

, P.J. Parikh

2

, M. Høyer

1

, P.R. Poulsen

1

1

Aarhus University Hospital, Department of oncology,

Aarhus C, Denmark

2

Washington University- School of Medicine, Department

of Radiation Oncology, St-Louis, USA

Purpose or Objective

Intrafraction motion is a challenge for accurate liver

radiotherapy delivery. Real-time treatment adaptation

(gating, tracking) may mitigate the detrimental effects of

motion, but requires reliable target motion monitoring. In

this study, we develop and validate a framework for fully

automatic monitoring of thoracic and abdominal tumors

on a conventional linac by combining real-time marker

segmentation in kV images with internal position

estimation by an external correlation model (ECM). The

validation is based on experiments and simulations using

known external and internal motion for 10 liver SBRT

patients.

Material and Methods

A fully automatic real-time motion monitoring framework

was developed. The framework combines auto-

segmentation of arbitrarily shaped implanted fiducial

markers in CBCT projections and intra-treatment kV

images with simultaneous streaming of an external optical

motion signal. Fig. A illustrates the workflow: A pre-

treatment CBCT is acquired with simultaneous recording

of the motion of an external block on the abdomen. The

markers are segmented in every CBCT projection and a 3D

voxel model of each marker is generated. The 3D marker

motion is estimated from the observed 2D motion and used

to optimize an ECM of the 3D internal marker motion

INT(t) as a function of the external motion EXT(t). During

treatment, INT(t) is estimated from EXT(t) at 20Hz, while

MV-scatter-free kV images are acquired every 3s during

beam pauses. The markers are segmented in real-time

using the ECM to determine the search area and

projections of the 3D voxel model as templates. The ECM

is continuously updated with the latest estimated 3D

marker position. The method was validated using Calypso-

recorded internal motion and simultaneous camera-

recorded external motion of 10 liver SBRT patients. The

validation included both experiments with a

programmable motion stage and simulations hereof for the

first patient as well as simulations for the remaining

patients. The real-time estimated 3D motion was

compared to the known tumor motion. For comparison,

the position estimation error was also calculated without

ECM updates.

Results

The segmentation rate was 90% with a mean 2D

segmentation error of 1.5pixels. Fig. B compares the

estimated and actual target motion for a portion of the

phantom experiment for Patient 1. The simulations agreed

with the experimental root-mean-square error within

0.4mm (Table 1). For all patients, the mean 3D root-mean-

square error was 1.74mm with ECM updates and 2.47mm

without ECM updates (Table 1).