Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  811 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 811 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S795

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

implant in a few seconds to the same level of accuracy as

a detailed MC calculation.

Conclusion

RayStretch

is a robust method for heterogeneity

corrections in prostate BT supported on TG-43 data. Its

compatibility with commercial TPSs and its high

calculation speed makes it feasible for use in clinical

settings for improving treatment quality. It will allow in a

second phase of this project, its use during intraoperative

ultrasound planning.

EP-1501 Field-by-field and composite plan pseudo-3D

verification of IMRT techniques with radiochromic film

T. Hanušová

1

, I. Horáková

2

, I. Koniarová

2

1

Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering-

Czech Technical University in Prague, Department of

Dosimetry and Application of Ionizing Radiation, Prague,

Czech Republic

2

National Radiation Protection Institute, Section of

medical exposures, Prague, Czech Republic

Purpose or Objective

The purpose of this study was to compare field-by-field

pre-treatment verification of IMRT dose distributions,

which is often performed clinically, to a pseudo-3D

method that verifies the global plan dose distribution in

several transversal, coronal and sagital planes.

Material and Methods

Sheets

of EBT3 film were placed into an IMRT cube

phantom into 5 transversal, 5 coronal and 5 sagital planes

close to the isocenter. The phantom was irradiated in this

setup with six IMRT step-and-shoot treatment plans. These

included one head-and-neck case and five pelvic cases.

Two of these plans had not previously met the clinical

tolerance criteria and were not used for treatment. Dose

distributions obtained with film were compared to

predicted dose distributions in OmniPro I’mRT software.

Gamma pass rates were obtained for 3 %/3 mm criteria.

The same IMRT plans were then measured field-by-field

with one EBT3 film sheet placed in the isocentric coronal

plane in an RW3 slab phantom, with gantry at 0° for all

fields. Again, gamma pass rates were obtained. Finally,

the results were compared to clinically performed

verification. This was done with a PTW seven29 detector

placed in the isocentric coronal plane in an RW3 slab

phantom and each field of the plan was tested with gantry

at 0°. Gamma pass rates for the PTW array measurements

were obtained in VeriSoft with the same criteria

3 %/3 mm. Treatment planning was performed in XiO

version 4.80 and plan delivery was carried out on a

Siemens Artiste linear accelerator at the Thomayer

Hospital in Prague.

Results

EBT3 film gave higher gamma pass rates than the PTW

seven29 array for field-by-field measurements for all

patients. If all fields of each plan were averaged out, the

average gamma score for both film and PTW detector was

above the clinical tolerance limit of 90 % for all plans. This

was not true for the composite plan measurements with

film. While a certain plan met the tolerance limit if

measured field-by-field, it could fail to meet the

tolerance limit when the global plan dose distribution was

measured. Moreover, for a given plan, different gamma

score values could be seen with film for the three

directions tested. While in some directions the plan met

the clinical tolerance limit of a 90 % gamma score, it could

fail to meet the limit in others. These findings can be

influenced by film directional dependence, but this is

supposed to be negligible.

Conclusion

Field-by-field pre-treatment verification of IMRT dose

distributions, both with radiochromic film and an array of

ion chambers, gave higher gamma scores than if the global

plan dose distribution was measured in a pseudo-3D

manner. Field-by-field measurements might be

insufficient to detect potential plan errors. More complex

investigations are recommended at least when new IMRT

techniques are being established in the clinic.

EP-1502 Dosimetric assessment of brass bolus using

radiochromic film

P. Lonski

1

, L. Walton

2

, N. Anderson

2

, J. Lydon

1

, T. Kron

1

,

B. Chesson

2

, R. Prabhakar

1

1

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Physical Sciences,

Melbourne, Australia

2

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Radiation Therapy

Services, Melbourne, Australia

Purpose or Objective

Brass bolus is a new type of bolus designed to enhance

surface dose in radiotherapy. Manufacturers claim the

impact on other radiation beam characteristics is

negligible. The main advantage is the mesh-like grid of

brass links can conform to complex patient contours which

compared to conventional bolus reduces air gaps between

bolus and patient skin. This study aims assess the

dosimetric impact of brass bolus on surface dose in

megavoltage photon beams.

Material and Methods

Brass bolus (Radiation Products Design Inc) with a nominal

thickness of 1.5mm was used on a tissue equivalent slab

phantom (RMI solid water). It was used as single layer and

folded over in 2 or 4 layers. Radiochromic film (EBT3) was

used to assess surface dose and dose variation on the

phantom for a 6 MV and 18MV photon beams (Varian 21iX).

Surface dose was measured with and without the brass

bolus which was placed on top of the film. A photo of the

brass is shown in Figure 1 (a) alongside a 50 mm section of

steel ruler. A film calibration curve was derived by

exposing samples from the same sheet to various known

doses under reference conditions. Film was scanned 12

hours post exposure and manually analysed using ImageJ

and MS Excel software.

Results

Surface dose measured using film in the absence of bolus

was 20 % of dose at d-max for a 6 MV beam in a 10 cm x

10 cm jaw-defined square field. Surface dose with a single

layer of the brass bolus increased to an average of 57 % of

dose at d-max (1.5cm). The mesh-like structure of the

brass resulted in a dose enhancement pattern which was

non-uniform across the film, as shown for a 1 cm x 1 cm

square region in Figure 1 (b), which shows the peaks and

troughs resulting from the mesh. The maximum dose

(peaks) was 62 % and the minimum (troughs) was 53 % of

dose at d-max under reference conditions. Increasing the

number of layers of bolus increased the surface dose.