Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  812 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 812 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S796

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Conclusion

Brass bolus may be used for surface dose enhancement in

external beam radiotherapy with megavoltage photons.

The surface dose increased from 20 % to 57 % of dose at d-

max for a 10 cm x 10 cm 6 MV field. The non-uniform

surface dose distribution should have minimal clinical

impact for multi-fraction radiotherapy regimes where

multiple layers and the random orientation of brass links

relative to skin surface will vary with daily setup.

EP-1503 The effect of tandem-ovoid applicator on the

dose distribution in GYN brachytherapy using Ir-192

M.H. Sadeghi

1

, A. Mehdizadeh

1

, M. Tafi

1

, R. Faghihi

1

, S.

Sina

2

, A.S. Meigooni

3

, A. Shabestani Monfared

4

1

Shiraz University, nuclear engineerning department,

Shiraz, Iran Islamic Republic of

2

Shiraz University, Radiation Research Center, Shiraz,

Iran Islamic Republic of

3

Comprehensive cancer center of Nevada, Las Vegas-

Nevada, USA

4

Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran Islamic

Republic of

Purpose or Objective

The dosimetry procedures by simple superposition

accounts only for the source shield, and does not take in

to account the attenuation of photons by the applicators.

The purpose of this investigation is estimation of the

effects the tandem ovoid applicator on the dose

distribution inside the phantom by MCNP5 Monte Carlo

simulations.

Material and Methods

In this study, the superposition method is used for

obtaining the dose distribution in the phantom for a

typical GYN brachytherapy. Then the sources are

simulated inside the tandem ovoid applicator, and the

dose at points A, B, bladder and rectum was compared

with the results of supper position. The exact dwell

positions, and times of the source, and positions of the

dosimetry points were determined from images of a

patient. The MCNP5 Monte Carlo code was used for

simulation of the phantoms, applicators, and the sources.

Results

The results of this study showed no significant differences

between the results of superposition method, and the MC

simulations for different dosimetry points. The difference

in all important dosimetry points were found to be less

than 4%. The maximum dose differences were found at the

tip of the detectors.

Conclusion

According to the results, the superposition method, adding

the dose of each source obtained by the TG-43 algorithm,

can estimate the dose to point A, B, bladder,and rectum

points with good accuracy.

EP-1504 Monte Carlo modeling of non-isocentric proton

pencil beam scanning treatments

A. Elia

1,2

, L. Grevillot

1

, A. Carlino

1,3

, T. Böhlen

1

, H.

Fuchs

1,4,5

, M. Stock

1

, D. Sarrut

2

1

EBG MedAustron GmbH, Medical Department, A-2700

Wiener Neustadt, Austria

2

CREATIS- Université de Lyon- CNRS UMR5220- Inserm

U1044- INSA-Lyon- Université Lyon 1, Centre Léon

Bérard, 69007 Lyon, France

3

University of Palermo, Department of Physics and

Chemistry, 90128 Palermo, Italy

4

Medical University of Vienna / AKH, Department of

Radiation Oncology, Vienna, Austria

5

Medical University of Vienna, Christian Doppler

Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation

Oncology, Vienna, Austria

Purpose or Objective

Monte Carlo (MC) calculation is the gold standard to

support dose calculation analytically performed by

Treatment Planning Systems (TPS). This work is built upon

a preliminary beam model of a fixed beam line based

mainly on measurements performed at isocenter. For non-

isocentric treatments, accurate description of beam spot

size for reduced air-gaps is of paramount importance for

accurate treatment planning. This work extends the

previous beam model based on final medical

commissioning data, with special emphasis on beam optics

modeling in non-isocentric conditions.

Material and Methods

GATE 7.2 based on GEANT4 10.02, using physics-builder

QBBC_EMZ and both

range cut

and

step limiter

of 0.1 mm

were used. Mean energy and energy spread were

optimized in order to match the clinical range (R80) and

the Bragg peak width measured in water. An initial set of

beam optics parameters (beam size, divergence and

emittance) was predicted at nozzle entrance (1.3 m

upstream the isocenter) for five key energies. At this step

of the study, a symmetrical proton pencil beam was

considered. A sensitivity study in order to understand the

influence of beam optics parameters at nozzle entrance

on the spot size in air for different air gaps was performed.

The beam optics parameters were then adjusted

empirically, in order to reach 1 mm in absolute deviation

or 10% in relative deviation within a treatment area

(defined from 58 cm upstream the isocenter to the

isocenter). Eventually, optical parameters were

extrapolated for 20 clinical energies.

Results

Differences obtained between simulated spot sizes and

the measured spot sizes seem to be due to systematic

differences in the modeling of beam scattering through

the nozzle and air gap. These differences are most

probably due to combined intrinsic uncertainties from

Multiple Coulomb Scattering (MCS) algorithm and nozzle

geometry implemented in the simulation. The achieved

agreement between measured and simulated spot FWHM

is within clinical tolerances of 1 mm in absolute deviation