Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  166 / 610 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 166 / 610 Next Page
Page Background

164

Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona SA, and InterAgua Servicios Integrales

del Agua SA v the Argentine Republic

(Decision on Liability of 30 July 2010) ICSID

Case No ARB/03/17

Veteran Petroleum Limited (Cyprus) v the Russian Federation

(Final Award of 18 July

2014) PCA Case No AA 228

Waste Management Inc v United Mexican States

(Dissenting Opinion of Keith Highet)

ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/98/258

Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v the Russian Federation

(Final Award of 18 July

2014) PCA Case No AA 227.

TREATISES

Dolzer R and Schreuer C,

Principles of International Investment Law

(2nd edn, OUP

2012)

Douglas Z,

The International Law of Investment Claims

(CUP 2009)

Hirsch M, ‘Investment Tribunal and Human Rights: Divergent Paths’ in Dupuy P

M, Francioni F, and Petersmann E U (eds),

Human Rights in International Investment

Law and Arbitration

(Oxford University Press 2009)

Lew J, Mistelis L, and Kröll S,

Comparative International Commercial Arbitration

(Kluwer Law International 2003)

Reiner C and Schreuer C, ‘Human Rights and International Investment Arbitration’

in Dupuy P M, Francioni F, and Petersmann E U (eds),

Human Rights in Internatio-

nal Investment Law and Arbitration

(Oxford University Press 2009)

Schreuer C and others,

The ICSID Convention: A Commentary

(3rd edn, CUP 2010)

Sornajah M,

The International Law on Foreign Investment

(3rd edn, CUP 2010)

Subedi S P,

International Investment Law Reconciling Policy and Principle

(Hart Pu-

blishing 2008)

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Bastin L, ‘The Amicus Curiae in Investor-State Arbitration’ (2012) 1 Cambridge J

Int‘l & Comp L 208

Dumberry P and Dumas-Aubin G, ‘When and How Allegations of Human Rights

Violations can be Raised in Investor-State Arbitration’ (2012) 13 J World Investment

& Trade 349

Gomez K F, ‘Rethinking the Role of Amicus Curiae in International Investment Ar-

bitration: How to Draw the Line Favorably for the Public Interest’(2012) 35 Fordham

Int‘l LJ 510

Choudhury B, ‘Recapturing Public Power: Is Investment Arbitration’s Engagement

of the Public Interest Contributing to the Democratic Deficit?’ (2008) 41 Vand J

Transnat’l L 775