Southern Corridor GRIP 2014–2023 |
69
Average daily
Technical Capacity
Flow Range
Oct
2011
Dec
2011
Feb
2012
Apr
2012
Jun
2012
Aug
2012
Oct
2012
Dec
2012
Feb
2013
Apr
2013
Jun
2013
Aug
2013
0
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
GWh/d
IP Panigaglia (GNL Italia > Snam Rete Gas)
Figure 4.26.1:
Panigaglia: Flows and booked capacity
vs. technical capacity (monthly)
Technical Capacity
Flow
Oct
2011
Dec
2011
Feb
2012
Apr
2012
Jun
2012
Aug
2012
Oct
2012
Dec
2012
Feb
2013
Apr
2013
Jun
2013
Aug
2013
0
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
GWh/d
IP Panigaglia (GNL Italia > Snam Rete Gas)
Figure 4.26.2:
Panigaglia: Flows and booked capacity
vs. technical capacity (daily)
C. LNG ENTRY POINTS
Differently from the dynamics experienced at pipelines interconnection points,
at LNG Entry Points gas flows are intrinsically more fluctuating, especially if the
punctual, daily values are considered.
More stable indications can be drawn from the analysis of monthly dynamics, which
are in general showing a decrease in the usage of the regasification terminals,
confirming the trend across Europe determined by the current LNG market condi-
tions.
Nevertheless, the role of LNG terminals both, on one hand, for security of supply and
peak shaving needs and, on the other hand, for the exploitation of possible commer-
cial opportunities cannot be denied or based on the study of a limited time window.
In this paragraph the technical capacity is meant to be the regasification capacity
of the terminal which may be different from that of the downstream pipeline infra-
structure.
Panigaglia (GNL Italia > Snam Rete Gas)
