Previous Page  12 / 88 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 12 / 88 Next Page
Page Background

Reading Matters

Research Matters

|

10

|

Reading Matters | Volume 16 • Winter 2016 |

scira.org CLICK HERE TO RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

will help me assess and better understand my students. I can

then take that information and build lessons and units to address

problem areas and include things that students enjoy as well.

I propose further research be done to determine how

attitudes impact student learning. Further research should also

be done on how attitudes change through a series of lessons.

Interviews may be needed to fully understand how the students’

thinking changed about revising and editing their writing.

Implications

Today many elementary students are very comfortable with

technology. They are eager to learn new technological skills

and absorb the new information easily. They were born with

technology surrounding them and are excited to learn new ways to

use it. However, many teachers lack access to technology (Howley,

Wood, & Hough, 2011; Purcell, Heaps, Buchanan, & Friedrich, 2013).

Small devices such as iPads and digital cameras are seldom found

in elementary classrooms even though they can be excellent

learning tools for students. Helping teachers get the tools they

need should be a priority for those making funding decisions.

Many students enjoy using technology; students who are

struggling or reluctant are no exception. Struggling and reluctant

learners are sometimes given basic rote memorization tasks or

more simplistic work to help them be successful in individual

work. Students who are always doing rote memorization to

catch up are often disengaged and uninterested in learning

leading them to slip further behind. While basic skills are

essential for these students to grow and continue to grow

as learners, we must use engaging tasks to challenge and

meet the needs of struggling and reluctant writers.

References

Bogard, J.M., & McMackin. M.C. (2012). Combining traditional and new literacies

in a 21st-century writing workshop.

The Reading Teacher

, 65(5), 313-323.

doi:10.1002/TRTR.01048

Graham, S., & Sandmel, K. (2011). The process writing approach: A meta-analysis.

The Journal of Educational Research

, 104, 396-407. doi:10.1080/00220671.2010.4

88703

Hartley, J., & McWilliam, K. (Eds.). (2009). Story circle:

Digital storytelling around

the world

. West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley- Blackwell Publishing.

Hicks, T. (2013).

Crafting digital writing: Composing texts across media and genres

.

Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Howley, A., Wood, L., & Hough, B. (2011). Rural elementary school teachers’

technology integration.

Journal of Research in Rural Education

, 26(9). Retrieved

from

http://jrre.vmhost.psu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/26-9.pdf

.

Kear, D. J., Coffman, G. A., & McKenna, M. C., Ambrosio, A.L. (2000). Measuring

attitude toward writing: A new tool for teachers.

Reading Teacher

, 54(1), 10-23.

Kittle, P. (2003). Reading practices as revision strategies: The gossipy reading

model.

The Quarterly

, 23(3), 32-37.

Purcell, K., Heaps, A., Buchanan, J., & Friedrich, L. (2013). How teachers are using

technology at home and in their classrooms.

Washington, DC: Pew Research Center’s

Internet & American Life Project

.

Simkins, M., Cole, K., Tavalin, F., & Means, B. (2002).

Increasing student learning

through multimedia projects

. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision &

Curriculum Development.

Sylvester, R. & Greenidge, W.L. (2009). Digital storytelling: Extending the potential

for struggling writers.

The Reading Teacher

, 63(4), 284-295.

Tobin, M. T. (2012). Digital storytelling: Reinventing literature circles.

Voices from

the Middle

, 20(2), 40-48.

Troia, G. A., Lin, S., Cohen, S., & Monroe, B. W. (2011). A year in the writing

workshop.

Elementary School Journal

, 112(1), 155-182.

Wright, V. H., &Wilson, E. K. (2011). Teachers’use of technology: Lessons learned

from the teacher education program to the classroom.

SRATE Journal

, 20(2), 48-60.

Monica Gatti

( mjgatti1@gmail.com

) recently completed her Masters’

degree in Elementary Education at Western Carolina University where

she focused her research on how to engage reluctant writers. She is

passionate about continuing to research how to engage students

in learning to foster their development as life-long learners.

Kelly N. Tracy

( kntracy@wcu.edu

) is an assistant professor

of literacy at Western Carolina University in Cullowhee, NC

where she lives with her husband and two daughters, Ella

and Madelyn. Kelly’s research interests include writing

pedagogy and writing professional development.