Previous Page  34 / 88 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 34 / 88 Next Page
Page Background

Reading Matters

Teaching Matters

|

32

|

Reading Matters | Volume 16 • Winter 2016 |

scira.org CLICK HERE TO RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

work through each step (Read, 2010). Some students are going

to require much more support than others, especially those with

little confidence or motivation in writing. Make sure to take the

time to build the skills with each student in an effective way and

reteach when needed. The time spent doing this is worth it!

Conclusion

As a result of this work, I have seen my 4th grade students

gain confidence and demonstrate lasting improvements in their

writing. Now my students talk more during writing conferences

than I do! They are able to share their goals, strategies, and

evidence from their work and make decisions about how to

improve as writers. I have found my role during conferences

has shifted to asking guiding questions and providing support,

when needed. Goal setting is one component of an effective

writing program that can strengthen conferences and facilitate

the development of independent, more engaged writers.

References

Anderson, C. (2000).

How’s it going: A practical guide to conferring with student

writers

. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Calkins, L. (2004).

The art of teaching writing

. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Calkins, L., Hartman, A., &White, Z. (2005).

One to one: The art of conferencing with

young writers

. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Estrada, B., &Warren, S. (2014). Increasing the writing performance of urban

senior placed at-risk through goal-setting in a culturally responsive and creativity-

centered classroom.

Journal of Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research

, 10, 50-63.

Gillespie, A., & Graham, S. (2014). A meta-analysis of writing intervention for

students with learning disabilities.

Exceptional Children

, 80, 454-473.

Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing

of adolescents in middle and high schools – A report to Carnegie Corporation of

New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.

Graves, D. (2004). What I’ve learned from teachers of writing.

Language Arts

, 82(2),

88–94.

Graves, D. (1982).

Writing: Teachers and children at work

. Portsmouth, NH:

Heinemann.

Hansen, B. D., &Wills, H. P. (2014). The effects of goal setting, contingent reward,

and instruction on writing skills.

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

, 47(1), 171-

175.

Kissel, B. (2008). Promoting writing and preventing writing failure in young

children.

Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth

,

52(4), 53-56.

Mermelstein, L. (2013).

Self-directed writers: The third essential element in the

writing workshop

. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Read, S. (2010). A model for scaffolding writing instruction: IMSCI.

The Reading

Teacher

, 64(1), 47-52.

Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling,

goal setting, and self-evaluation.

Reading and Writing Quarterly

, 19, 159-172.

Schunk, D. H. (1990). Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning.

Educational Psychologist

, 25, 71-86.

Troia, G. (2014). Evidence-based practices for writing instruction (Document No.

IC-5). Retrieved from University of Florida, Collaboration for Effective Educator,

Development, Accountability, and Reform Center website:

http://ceedar.education

.

ufl.edu/tools/innovation-configuration/

Amanda Pringle

( pringlea@fortmillschools.org

) graduated from

Clemson University with her Bachelor’s in Elementary Education in

2011 and obtained her Masters in Reading fromWinthrop University

in 2015. She taught fourth grade for four years and is transitioning

into second grade for her fifth year of teaching. Her favorite pastime

is reading, and she loves inspiring young readers and writers.

Shawnna Helf

( helfs@winthrop.edu

) is an associate

professor of literacy education at Winthrop University.

Her research interests include early reading intervention,

instructional design, and teaching efficiency.