Background Image
Previous Page  137 / 140 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 137 / 140 Next Page
Page Background

135

J

anuary

2008

www.read-tpt.com

Case study

A low volume, high product mix tube mill operation (providing tube to

the automotive ride handling and exhaust sector) needed to reduce

the cost of its tube making operations. The operation had to make

120 different products and keep total stock levels below 6 days.

The mill had to be suitable to handle stainless steel 409 436,

aluminium coated mild steel, high tensile carbon steel and deep

draw quality carbon steel. The mill would have to handle 18

diameters between 36 and 60.5mm and 10 wall thicknesses from

0.8 to 3.2mm. These activities were undertaken and a project to

purchase a new tube mill line was developed and approved.

The existing tube mill was 50 years old with many modifications.

Reject levels were still high and productivity low. Both of these

indicators had improved tremendously over a two year period but

were still a long way from world class.

To meet the requirements of a just-in-time (JIT) environment, there

was a need for high quality and accurate tube where defects are

counted in parts per million. There was also the challenging task of

reducing the cost of manufacture.

Tube mill specifications

(quick change high quality tube mill)

The tube mill, that was specified and then met and surpassed the

targets, is described below.

1. An automatic double-sided vertical uncoiler that was loaded

using c hook and crane

2. Leveller to flatten the nose and tail of the coils (fully automatic)

3. Shear and welder TIG (fully automatic), hole punch for end

weld detection and mistake proofing

4. Strip accumulator to ensure the mill did not stop for end welds

5. Flying strip shear to minimise changeover times and scrap

6. Break down stands 1 and 2 where mounted on a turret to allow

for quick change and offline tooling setup

7. A cage was used to form the tube from the break downs to the

fin passes

8. Fin passes 1 and 2, fin pass side stand and the inverted 3

roll squeeze stand where mounted on a Turret similar to the

breakdowns. There was limited space for the installation and

the Turret provided the maximum utilisation of the space. No

seam guide was used

9. A solid state HF welder was installed. The repeatability of the

settings was critical for the stainless steel manufacture

10. A Pyrometer and squeeze pressure monitoring and feed back

control system was installed

11. SCADA system installed to track 16 variables at 1 second

intervals and also down load variables from the master data

base to the PLC

12. Internal fin cutting was installed with monitoring equipment

13. An ironing pass stand was installed to assist control the internal

fin cutting depth required to produce tubing for cylinder bore

product

14. Eddy current was installed after the cooling tunnel however its

use was discarded as other systems ensured that faults that

the eddy current could find were not produced

15. The sizing section consisted of a single Modular Sizing Mill

(MSM). This provided OD tolerance better that a conventional

mill. However, OD tolerance can be further improved by

adding additional MSM stands or a rotary sizing mill or some

combination of these technologies

16. A simple motorised turkshead was used as a straightening

stand

17. Ink jet printers were installed and linked to the master database

and the clocks synchronised with the one used by the SCADA

system. Tubing was continuously identified with date and

time to the second. Any faulty tube could then be tracked and

investigated with ease

18. A flying double shear type cut off was used. Due to the high

speed and short lengths. 100 metres per minute at 4 metres

19. The tube was then sorted automatically on the run out

conveyor

20. The internal swarf was removed used high pressure water and

then drained

21. The tube was then stacked into stillages and sent to the cutting

machines, storage or packing

22. The mill layout was such that the uncoiler’s station was next to

the mill operator’s station. This enabled either operator to run

both stations when the other was away on other duties.

The operation was very successful and met and exceeded all

expectations. The success of these types of projects is the result of

understanding what is required, what is possible, what is available

and working closely with the suppliers to get the desired result.

Figure 6

:

Quick change high quality mill for the automotive industry

Kusakabe Electric & Machinery Co Ltd

11-2, 2-chome, Murotani

Nishi-ku, 651-2241, Hyogo, Kobe, Japan

Tel

: +81 78 992 9100

Fax

: +81 78 992 9139

Email

:

sales@kusakabe.com

Website

:

www.kusakabe.com