Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  54 / 92 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 54 / 92 Next Page
Page Background

Technical article

November 2015

52

www.read-eurowire.com

Jörg Bör

CABX Cable Expert Dipl-Ing

Aachen

Germany

Tel

: +49 163 439 1964

Email

:

info@cabx.de

This need is taken into account in

the European Constructive Products

Regulation

[6]

.

We have seen there are two aspects of fire

protection: fire avoidance and reduction

of fire impacts. How do these aspects

correlate to the regional differences in fire

protection strategies?

4.1 Fire Avoidance

The common fire protection philosophy in

America is to prevent fire at any cost. There

are high amounts invested into research

and investigation and the results are very

challenging regulations regarding the fire

performance of indoor cabling in terms of

self ignition, flame propagation and fire

resistance. To meet these requirements

there is no other way than to use halogens

as flame retardants in cable compounds,

as well as in building materials.

This approach risks the threat of personal

injury by acid fumes and of emergency

exits being hidden by dense smoke.

4.2 Reduction of Fire Impacts

It seems to be complete nonsense to

reduce potential fire impact but to do

nothing to avoid fire. And it really is,

because there are so many and various

impacts of fire.

There may be very specific situations

where such a scenario makes sense, but

such an exotic application shall not be

discussed in this paper. Nevertheless we

do not know any regulations which just

support this approach.

Reduction of fire impact cannot be a fire

protection strategy itself but it should be

an important part of a combined strategy,

as it is European standard.

4.3 Diverse Redundancy

It is said that Europeans and especially

Germans have a preference for multiple

safety. We are happy to know there is a

second protection instrument if the first

protection instrument should fail.

Combined safety strategy is well-known

in many technologies relevant to safety.

So in safety discussions regarding

nuclear power plants the idea of diverse

redundancy is a basic approach.

This means there must be an additional

safety procedure which works completely

independently from the first one in case

the basic safety procedure does not work.

So in Europe it is the consensus to avoid

fire as much as possible but at the same

time to keep low the consequences on

health or goods if a fire happens. Due to

physical reasons a better reduction of

the effects is achieved by reduced fire

avoidance.

But in total the risk according to

Equation

(1)

is significantly lower. This is also shown

in

Figure 2

.

To protect people’s health in case of fire it

is widely required to use halogen free, low

smoke materials for buildings including

indoor cabling. This is mandatory in

public premises but also recommended in

residential areas.

5 Conclusions

Due to cultural differences the focus of

fire protection in America is to reduce the

probability of fire, but in Europe mainly the

dimensions of possible health injuries and

material damages are to be controlled.

Due to these differences in fire protection

strategies there are wide differences in

technical standards, requirements, and

specifications for cables as well as for other

construction components regarding fire

performance.

The European approach follows the

theory of diverse redundancy. Even if the

requirements to each single parameter for

cable fire performance are lower, there is a

much better protection with less effort in

total.

Different fire protection strategies are

related to intercultural differences. To

sell a product in a region it is not only

necessary to meet all specifications but to

understand the needs and fears of humans

living there. Just by addressing these

aspects it is possible to convince potential

customers of the advantages a product

offers. Thus cultural relativity has to be

taken into account in worldwide business.

Cross-cultural awareness is an important

skill in global product management.

6 Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Prof Dr Armin Wittmann

from Trier University of Applied Sciences

for providing information regarding risk

management.

Nicolai Bör from GIZ (German Association

for

International

Cooperation)

for

giving an increased understanding of

intercultural differences and their effects

on the B2B business.

ICYE

(International

Christian

Youth

Exchange)

and

its

national

sub-organisations

whose

activities

intensified the experience of cross-cultural

awareness.

n

7 References

[1]

G Hofstede, “Management

Scientists

Are

Human” University of Limburg, The Netherlands

Management Science, Vol 40, No 1, (Jan 1994)

[2]

C Chapman, S Ward, “Project Risk Management:

Processes, Techniques, and Insights”, 2

nd

Ed, John

Wiley & Sons Ltd (2003)

[3]

Robin E McDermott, Raymond J Mikulak, Michael

R Beauregard,“The Basics of FMEA”, 2

nd

Ed, Taylor &

Francis Group LLC (2009)

[4]

Society for Risk Analysis (SRA);

www.sra.org

[5]

Wikipedia,

the

free

encyclopedia;

http://

en.wikipedia.org

[6]

European Commission: “Regulation (EU) No.

305/2011of the European Parliament and of

the Council of 9

th

March 2011 laying down

harmonised conditions for the marketing of

construction products and repealing Council

Directive 89/106/EEC”; OJ L 88 of 4

th

April 2011

Paper courtesy of the 63

rd

IWCS Technical

Symposium, Providence, Rhode Island, USA,

November 2014.

Material

Flame retardant

Low smoke

Halogen free

PVC

X

No

Polyolefin

– –

X

Yes

Polyurethane

– –

X

?

TPE

X

?

FRNC

+

X

Yes

Fluorpolymer

+ +

No!

Table 2

:

Typical fire performance properties of cable compounds