Previous Page  385 / 424 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 385 / 424 Next Page
Page Background

GAZKTTK

DECEMBER 1995

Judicial Review; A Thematic

Approach.

The development of judicial review

has been one of the pre-eminent

achievements of our times. Apart

from the election of the legislature,

judicial review is the citizen's legal

"weapon" in a modern democratic

state. The "supervision" of the

legislature and public bodies is the

core element of judicial review.

Judicial review has emerged as a

counterweight to the gFowth of

executive power.

Professor

Brigid Hadfield,

professor

of public law at Queen's University,

Belfast, has brought together in this

book contributions from various

scholars who examine judicial review,

from various perspectives, in the

jurisdictions of England and Wales,

Scotland, Northern Ireland and the

Republic of Ireland. Judicial review in

the context of the.environment,

education, local government, the

criminal process, prisons and national

security are the subjects of individual

chapters. Mr

Gerard Hogan,

barrister and Fellow of Trinity

College, Dublin, has contributed a

chapter on the law of judicial review

in this jurisdiction.

There is considerable similarity in the

law and procedure of judicial review

in the United Kingdom and Ireland

with some notable differences

particularly on the public/private

law divide.

Lord Woolf in his preface to the book

states that the majority of

administrative lawyers practising in

the High Court in London "are

abysmally unaware" of the decisions

on judicial review in the other

jurisdictions that have similar law and

procedure in relation to judicial

review of administrative actions. This

book will assist in remedying that

lacuna.

Judicial Review: A Thematic

Approach

is an authorative practice-

oriented text written by a

distinguished group of lawyers expert

in the field of judicial review.

Dr Eamonn G Hall

The Law of Termination of

Employment

by Robert Upex - Fourth Edition

Sweet & Maxwell p.p. 482 £75.00 stg

The first sentence of the preface of

Prof. Upex's latest edition explains

why to a very great extent, his

excellent work is of limited relevance

to Irish lawyers. He states "So great

have been the changes in Employment

Law since the previous edition of this

book that it is tempting for

commentators to resort to hyperbole in

describing them". While these changes

have arisen through many important

Court decisions in the UK and from

the European Court of Justice, Prof.

Upex goes on to refer to the legislative

changes in the UK. These legislative

changes have led to a significant

widening of the difference between

Irish and British employment law. The

legislature in the UK has shown

commendable attention to detail in

building proper structures and

frameworks for the operation of

primary legislation. This is notably

lacking in Ireland. While the primary

legislation has many similar features

the detail and operational framework

is so significantly different as to make

it very difficult to find parallels in

Irish law.

This is a very substantial work and is

both comprehensive and well written.

It is, however, as I have stated, of

limited appeal in Ireland. There is

some useful information to be found

here that is not readily available

elsewhere. An example is the question

of references for former employees

which is given a chapter to itself at the

end of the book. While it consists of

only four pages it is a useful summary

of current law and makes reference to

the House of Lords Decision in

Spring

v Guardian Assurance pic.

The

chapter opens with the statement that

an employer is not obliged to provide

a reference for an employee. In the

Spring case the majority of the Law

Lords stated that a term may be

implied into certain contracts of

employment that a reference will be

furnished. Prof. Upex refers to that

view at the end of the chapter. In not

linking the initial statement and the

later statement there is a danger the

reader will stop at the first sentence

and go no further.

The work is broken into four sections.

The first section consists of eight

chapters on statutory rights. Given the

statutory differences between the two

jurisdictions this chapter is of little

use except where it relates to the

transfer of an undertaking. The

information here is well presented but

great care must be taken to ensure that

general principles sought to be applied

in Ireland do not arise from the UK

Domestic Regulations but rather from

the EU Directive given the significant

differences between our Regulations

and the UK equivalent. Prof. Upex has

an eye for the practical issues relevant

to legislation and this allows him to

give neat summaries of what might

otherwise can be complicated law. His

piece on the transfer of undertakings

is a case in point. He manages to

accurately summarise the

Secretary of

State for Employment v Spence

and

Litster

v

Forth Drydock &

Engineering Company Limited

(In

Receivership) in the space of one and

a half pages. He does what all good

teachers should do which is to

highlight the area in which a problem

might arise and point the reader in the

direction of where the relevant law

will be found. He avoids any social or

political dimension to his approach or

comments. The chapter on redundancy

is only of use in Ireland in its

references to the definition of

redundancy itself quoting some useful

case law not easily found elsewhere.

The definition is different to the Irish

equivalent but has sufficient parallel

to make some of the precedent case

law of use to us. As with almost every

aspect of this book the practitioner

using it must be very familiar with the

equivalent Irish law in order to spot

sometimes very subtle differences.

Statutory definitions are dealt with in

excellent detail but again one has to

first understand the parallels with

Irish legislation before definitions can

be relied on. The definition of "the

date of dismissal" in chapter 5 is not

appropriate to Irish law whereas the

definition of "lock-out" is useful and

parallel case law such as

Tramp

Shipping Co-operation v Greenwich

361