Previous Page  59 / 424 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 59 / 424 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

JANUARY/FEBRUARY 1995

The Future of Irish Legal Services in a

Global Economy

by Bernard O'Connor*

Part II

The economic integration that has

happened in Europe in the last 40 years

is taking place at a much faster pace

globally. Communications have made

working the global market as easy, if

not easier, than practising on circuit in

Ireland.

Services have beeq a leader in this

economic integration with the financial

sector leading the way. Accountancy is

not far behind. Legal services come in

a poor third.

On a global integrated services level,

the big six accountancy firms truly are

integrated and pose a great competitive

threat to the worldwide legal profession.

They provide a "seamless" service,

meaning that if you walk in the door in

downtown Chicago that your global

problems will be addressed from your

local office. Only Baker and Mackenzie

attempt to do this on the legal side.

The UK based Solicitors' firms and the

large New York based law firms are

some way behind the accountants but

they are making efforts to catch up.

The failure of the legal profession to

keep pace with the changing world is

due to many causes not least of which is

the need for detailed knowledge of local

procedures and the need for lawyer

organisations to maintain standards of

professional conduct and service.

Lawyers protect their privileged access

to court work. However, very few

transnational companies go to Court.

Why waste time and money on an

uncertain and public result in a

jurisdiction that you don't understand,

when you can go to arbitration. Non-

lawyers are strong, and getting

stronger, in arbitration.

In competition law there is no

requirement to be a practising lawyer

to represent clients before the EU

Commission and, as far as I am aware,

the majority of the national

competition authorities.

In trade law, again, there is no

requirement to be a practising lawyer to

argue an anti-dumping or subsidy case

in Brussels or to represent a sovereign

state in the dispute settlement proced-

ures of the GATT. Nor is there the need

to be a lawyer to persuade the Irish

administration that a local Irish practice

needs to be changed, by legislation if

necessary, so as to remove a barrier to

market access or an inconsistency with

EU or international law.

Accountants and consultants are

increasingly becoming involved in this

type of trade and competition work.

Lawyers tend to be lagging behind.

Solicitors working in the field of

commercial and tax law will already be

aware of the increased competition

from accountancy firms in the

provision of legal services, tax advice,

company formation and management.

All of them employ lawyers. Some,

such as Arthur Andersen, are

establishing their own law firms.

I am informed that work referred from

other UK and US law firms forms a

large percentage of the work carried out

by the larger Irish commercial practices.

If globally lawyers are not getting

commercial law work, then the flow to

the large Irish firms will slow down.

Lawyers are right to protect standards

but they should not let standards be an

excuse for protectionism of whatever

sort. Those who hide behind

protectionist barriers will lose out.

This is because, quite simply, the flow

of commerce and practice will move

on around them and leave them safe

and secure and dry on their

diminishing but secure island of

practice. Lawyers should be looking

for opportunities to partake in the

global market for legal services not

protecting themselves from more

aggressive professionals.

The Irish legal profession along with

Irish Government agencies needs to

respond to these developments. Ireland

should be promoted as an international

legal centre to cater for the growing

amount of international legal work

which is not necessarily tied to one

particular legal jurisduction.

With regard to differences of

procedures and local rules, which have

been a core argument for the

maintenance of the court monopolies, I

would argue that with the further

!

integration of the European economy

j

there will be a lessening of differences |

in both the Member States and the

advanced industrial economies. This

í

trend will continue in all market

economies where the regulation of

property and the exercise of property

rights will gradually become similar.

The trend to similarity is sharpest in

j

Europe where the EU laws in financial

services, telecommunication, transport,

environment, consumer protection,

intellectual property, trade

competition, social rights, to name but

a few, both dominate and predicate

national law.

The provision of legal services is

therefore becoming, and needs to

become more, globally orientated. Irish

lawyers have a number of great

advantages to take part in this

globalisation of legal services, either

as individuals or firms: the English

language; an Anglo-Saxon legal