Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  297 / 350 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 297 / 350 Next Page
Page Background

3M™ Petrifilm™ Rapid Yeast Mold Count Plate

1

AOAC Performance Tested Method

2

3

Abstract

4

The 3M™ Petrifilm™ Rapid Yeast Mold Count Plate (Petrifilm RYM) detects and enumerates yeast and

5

mold from a variety of foods. Ten matrices – yogurt, sour cream, almonds, sliced apples, frozen bread

6

dough, ready-made pie, sandwiches, dehydrated soup, fermented salami and frozen ground beef patties

7

– were compared to the ISO 21527:2008 parts 1 and 2 and the FDA BAM Chapter 18 reference methods

8

at 48 and 60 hours. Naturally contaminated samples that covered three levels of contamination (low

9

level 10 -100 CFU/g, medium level 100-1,000 CFU/g, and a high level 1,000-10,000 CFU/g) were

10

analyzed. Matrices that were not naturally contaminated were artificially contaminated with a yeast or

11

mold, and five replicates were analyzed at four levels (uninoculated, low, medium, and high). The

12

results demonstrated that the 3M Petrifilm RYM Plate method as shown to be equivalent to or better

13

than the average log counts of the ISO 21527:2008 parts 1 and 2 and the FDA BAM Chapter 18 reference

14

methods at 48 and 60 hours. In addition, the repeatability of the Petrifilm RYM method was equivalent

15

to or better than the reference methods at both 48 and 60 hours. In the independent laboratory

16

validation study, there was no significant difference in detection, enumeration, or repeatability between

17

the Petrifilm RYM method and ISO 21527:2008 parts 1 and 2 and the FDA BAM Chapter 18 reference

18

methods for yogurt at 48 and 60 hours. For frozen ground beef patties there was a significant difference

19

between the Petrifilm RYM Plate method and the reference methods at 48 and 60 hours with the

20

Petrifilm RYM method enumerating more organisms that the reference methods(p<0.05). In strain

21

studies, of the 42 yeast and mold tested, all produced typical colonies on Petrifilm RYM Plate method.

22

Of the 4 bacterial strains that should not have been detected by the Petrifilm RYM Plate method, all 4

23

strains did not grow on the plate. Lot-to-lot study of Petrifilm RYM Plates was evaluated and showed no

24

differences at time zero. In assay ruggedness studies, there was no difference in performance for three

25

test parameters: incubation time, incubation temperature and type of diluents used to rehydrate the

26

plate medium.

27

28

29

30

1

AOAC Research Institute

Expert Review Panel Use Only

OMAMAN-16D/ PTM Report

ERP Use Only - December 2014