Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  35 / 88 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 35 / 88 Next Page
Page Background

Central Eastern Europe GRIP 2017 |

35

2017

2020 Low

2025 Low

2025 PCI

2025 High

2020 PCI

2020 High

20%< RF

5% < RF ≤ 20%

1% < RF ≤ 5%

0% < RF ≤ 1%

Remaining Flexibility (RF)

0.001%< DR ≤ 5%

5% < DR ≤ 10%

10% < DR ≤ 50%

50% < DR

Disrupted Rate (DR)

Figure 3.3:

Evolution of Disrupted Rate (DR) and Remaining Flexibility (RF), Normal situation,

Peak Day (DC), Green Evolution

Assessment of the peak day under the

normal situation is based on the results

modelled and presented in the TYNDP

2017 (TYNDP 2017 Annex E – Model-

ling Results) and serves as a baseline

reference scenario for CEE GRIP specif-

ic disruption simulations.

Analysis of the normal situation is also

part of the TYNDP 2017, and the results

indicate that the European gas infra-

structure, respectively in the CEE

region, is able to cope with high demand

situations. The differences between the

Blue Transition and Green Evolution

scenarios appear only in the LOW infra-

structure scenario, in 2025, when the

Remaining Flexibility of Slovenia will de-

crease.

The only country which faces a Disrup-

tion Demand under specific modelled

conditions is Croatia (LOW, 2025). This

is caused by increasing country

demand over the long term and can be

mitigated by the implementation of

planned projects which belong to the

PCI category.