Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  73 / 96 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 73 / 96 Next Page
Page Background

A GLOBAL OUTLOOK ON METHANE GAS HYDRATES

73

3.4.4

Well completion

Well completion is the final step in well construction prior

to production. Well completion includes design and installa-

tion of the production casing, measures to access the forma-

tion and to control near-wellbore interactions, placement of

downhole production equipment (production tubing, down-

hole pumps, etc.), and installation of equipment to allow in-

tervention during production should unexpected operational

issues arise or should it be desirable to further stimulate

production from the reservoir. Advances in completion tech-

nologies have substantially improved the efficiency of oil and

gas recovery and enabled cost-effective production in reser-

voirs that would not have been considered economic even a

few decades ago.

The major elements of a typical well completion for a produc-

tion well using the pressure drawdown technique are shown

in Figure 3.5. Completion considerations for gas hydrate pro-

duction will likely include:

• Measures, such as sand screens or gravel packs, to con-

trol sand inflow to the wellbore due to loss of sediment

strength upon dissociation of in situ gas hydrates in un-

consolidated media;

• Custom-designed downhole pumps and/or downhole

heaters and/or chemical flow lines, depending on the gas

hydrate production method utilized;

• Equipment to lift or pump produced gas and water to the

surface;

• Completions that enable concurrent production of multi-

ple gas hydrate layers from the same well; and

• Provisions for smart completions that allow real-time

monitoring of the formation response and manipulation

of downhole pressure and temperature to optimize gas hy-

drate production.

3.4.5

Managing and monitoring a

producing gas hydrate field

Production operations for a typical gas hydrate field would

likely extend over a decade or more. Experience to date sug-

gests that the technologies used for sand-dominated reser-

voirs will be based on production equipment and procedures

already employed in conventional oil and gas fields. How-

ever, as commercial production of gas hydrate is still hypo-

thetical, it is challenging to establish a reliable basis for the

prediction of the long-term production response of a gas hy-

drate reservoir. For a conventional gas field, such predictions

are normally accomplished through sophisticated numerical

reservoir simulations that enable the estimation of flow re-

sponses and evolving changes in critical reservoir properties

over the anticipated production life of the field.

Given the importance of reliable field predictions, considera-

ble effort is underway, worldwide, to develop and/or improve

reservoir simulators to accommodate the unique properties

and behaviours of gas hydrates. However, the task is complex.

While some progress has been made in verifying the models

through short-term formation pressure tests (Anderson

et

al.

2010; Wilder

et al.

2008) and the Mallik 2008 full-scale

test (Kurihara

et al.

2012; Udden

et al.

2012; Wright 2011),

results remain speculative. Rutqvist

et al.

(2009), Moridis

Horizontal completion

Surface casing

Subsurface

safety valve

Production

casing

Gas lift

Production packer

Gas hydrate

bearing strata

Underburden sediment

Pump and gas separator

Slotted liner with screens

or gravel pack

Sea oor

Sur cial

sediment

Overburden/

cap sediment

Intermediate casing

Chemical injection

mandrel and lines

Sub sea tree

with control lines

Vertical completion

Figure 3.5:

Well completion for gas hydrate production. Well

schematics show possible horizontal and vertical well completions

for a gas hydrate production well employing the depressurization

technique. Modified after Hancock

et al.

(2010).