Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  76 / 96 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 76 / 96 Next Page
Page Background

FROZEN HEAT

76

Commercial production of gas from gas hydrates has not

yet occurred. Several production research and develop-

ment studies have, however, been carried out, most notably

at the Mallik site in Canada (see summary in Dallimore

et

al.

2012) and in the Nankai Trough (Yamamoto

et al.

, 2014).

While this research has clearly identified depressurization as

3.5

TIME FRAME FOR

GAS HYDRATE DEVELOPMENT

Hydrocarbon resources are commonly described as either

“conventional” or “unconventional”. Conventional resources

are those that exist in the subsurface as liquids or gases

under high pressure and within permeable reservoirs such

that commercially-viable production (extraction) rates can be

achieved simply by drilling into the reservoir. In fact, a primary

concern with conventional reservoirs is in controlling and limiting

the production rate, particularly in the early phases. Failure

to maintain this well control can result in well blow-outs and

uncontrolled hydrocarbon release to the environment. In contrast,

reservoir quality in unconventional reservoirs is typically very low,

and as a result, additional engineering means are required to

improve reservoir quality around well bores to achieve desired

flow rates. Gas hydrates, which require some combination of

reservoir depressurization, heating, and/or chemical injection to

be productive, are therefore unconventional reservoirs.

While the vast majority of hydrocarbons produced for energy

continue to come from conventional reservoirs, production

from unconventional resources, most notably shale gas in

the United States, is growing rapidly. It cannot be assumed,

however, that all unconventional resources will be associated

with the same environmental risks. The following discusses

general types of environmental risks with respect to the issue

of gas hydrate production.

Loss of well control/spills: This risk, which is significant

in conventional resource development, can also occur in

Box 3.5

Environmental Impacts of Gas Hydrate Production: Comparison to

Existing Conventional and Unconventional Gas Development

unconventional development, particularly where resources are

deeply buried and under high pressure. Gas hydrates, which are by

definition shallow (and thus relatively low-pressure) resources, are

therefore very unlikely to support uncontrollable flow rates. In fact, a

primary challenge in gas hydrate production is not only establishing

flow, but sustaining it. Because gas hydrate reservoirs only produce

recoverable methane when artificially (and temporarily) removed

from their natural pressure condition (a condition that is imposed

by the simple presence of the overlying sediment for onshore gas

hydrates, and by the water column for offshore gas hydrates), any

cessation in the energy input used to achieve pressure reduction will

immediately re-establish gas hydrate stability conditions and halt the

methane release (see Nagakubo

et al.

, 2011; Moridis

et al.

, 2014).

Lastly, liquid hydrocarbons are not known to pool at the shallow

sediment depths at which gas hydrates occur, so the risk of inducing

oil spills while recovering methane from gas hydrate is minimal.

Water Consumption: Unconventional production, such as shale

gas, shale oil, oil shale, and tar sands are characterized by large

water demands during extraction. Gas hydrate drilling and

production, as now envisioned, would require minimal water

useage as the primary stimulation method will be the imposition

of reduced pressure through simple partial evacuation of the

wellbore, as opposed to water-intensive thermal stimulation or

permeability-creation through artificial fracturing.

Water Quality Impacts: All hydrocarbon production results

in the co-production of reservoir brines along with the oil and