Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  101 / 194 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 101 / 194 Next Page
Page Background

Morgan Hill, California

95

Zucker Systems

See our discussion under the “Expedited Review” heading in the Policy Issues

section about recommendations to improve the process.

Given the City’s budget constraints, we agree with the City’s current practice of

proactively updating fees to capture all costs for application services.

In addition, it is not clear whether the “Preliminary Plan Review” fee (e.g., Non-

RDCS) captures labor costs associated with Council review, which we understand is

an option in addition to the applicant receiving Planning Commission review.

98.

Recommendation:

The fee schedule for Preliminary Plan Review Fee

should capture council review fees and show separate fees for Planning

Commission Preliminary Review and Council Preliminary Review.

Email System

Most of the Staff interviewed reported that the email system is ineffective due to

insufficient storage capacity (e.g., 100mb). As a result, staff continual has to manage

emails to create additional storage capacity for daily incoming emails. In addition,

while emails can be received on smart phones, they can’t be managed by a smart

phone, which creates capacity issues if staff is out of the office for extended periods.

The capacity issue also makes it difficult to retain important emails related to

processing and chronically prevents staff from successfully transmitting emails to the

Director as the emails are returned due to the Director’s email being full.

99.

Recommendation:

The Community Development Director should work

with IT to identify email storage capacity issues and increase capacity if needed

to resolve the issues identified.

Filing Systems/Records Management

We received a lot of adverse feedback from staff interviewees concerning the existing

filing system in the Division. Generally, interviewees reported that the system is a

mix of paper files stored on-site, electronic files in various locations and archived

paper files stored off-site, which can frustrate research efforts and hinder processing.

The following summarizes the responses we received:

Files are in paper format predominantly and need to be scanned and archived;

Paper files are stored onsite throughout the office and offsite in a separate

building. Records archived offsite are retrieved via a records request that takes

2-4 days to retrieve;