Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  185 / 288 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 185 / 288 Next Page
Page Background

Ten-Year Network Development Plan 2017 Main Report |

185

2020 Low

0%

20%

100%

0%

20%

100%

50%

Remaining Flexibility

Disrupted Demand

Figure 6.4:

Remaining Flexibility for Langeled, Franpipe, Transmed, GreenStream, MEG and

TANAP route disruption, Low infrastructure level, all Demand Scenarios and

High Demand Situations

6.3.2.3 Disrupted Demand and Remaining Flexibility

under Route Disruption

This section investigates the effect of a supply route disruption during a high demand

situation. Only the additional effect compared to the result from the situation without

the route disruptions are shown. Results are shown for the European Green Revolu-

tion and the Blue Transition scenarios.

The gas infrastructure is resilient to most of the route disruptions cases investigated.

The Ukraine transit disruption leads to disrupted demand. In some of the scenarios,

the Belarus transit disruption also leads to disrupted demand on the long term.

Franpipe, GreenStream, Langeled, MEG, TANAP

and Transmed route disruptions

The disruption cases have been modelled for Franpipe, GreenStream, Langeled,

MEG, TANAP and Transmed. Results do not show significant differences in terms of

remaining flexibility for security of supply needs, compared to the case without route

disruption covered in 6.3.2.1. The results as illustrated below are the same for all

cases.