613 / 1195
1
Chicken liver paté
2
For the chicken liver paté analysis there were 11 confirmed positives for the LPT method
3
and 8 confirmed positives for the USDA reference method. All uninoculated samples
4
were negative with both methods. There were no false positives for the VIDAS method
5
(dPOD = 0, CI: -0.28 to 0.28). There was no significant difference between the LPT
6
method and the reference method using unpaired Chi-square test (
X
2
= 0.88) or the POD
7
(dPOD = 0.15, CI: -0.15 to 0.41). See Tables 3, 8, 9 in the Appendix.
8
Deli ham – 25g
9
For the deli ham (25g) analysis there were 9 confirmed positives for the LPT method and
10
6 confirmed positives for the USDA reference method. All uninoculated samples were
11
negative with both methods. There were no false positives for the VIDAS method (dPOD
12
= 0, CI: -0.28 to 0.28). There was no significant difference between the LPT method and
13
the reference method using unpaired Chi-square test (
X
2
= 0.94) or the POD (dPOD =
14
0.15, CI: -0.14 to 0.41). See Tables 3, 8, 9 in the Appendix.
15
Deli ham – 125g
16
For the deli ham (125g) analysis there were 16 confirmed positives for the LPT method
17
and 15 confirmed positives for the USDA reference method. All uninoculated samples
18
were negative with both methods. There were no false positives for the VIDAS method
19
(dPOD = 0, CI: -0.25 to 0.25). There was no significant difference between the LPT
20
method and the reference method using unpaired Chi-square test (
X
2
= 0.14) or the POD
21
(dPOD = 0.05, CI: -0.20 to 0.30). See Tables 4, 8, 9 in the Appendix.
22
Ground beef – 125g
23
For the ground beef (125g) analysis there were 7 confirmed positives for the LPT method
24
and 7 confirmed positives for the USDA reference method. All uninoculated samples
25
were negative with both methods. There were no false positives for the VIDAS method
26
(dPOD = 0, CI: -0.27 to 0.27). There was no significant difference between the LPT
27
method and the reference method using unpaired Chi-square test (
X
2
= 0) or the POD
28
(dPOD = 0, CI: -0.27 to 0.27). See Tables 4, 8, 9 in the Appendix.
29
Deli turkey – 125g
30
For the deli turkey (125g) analysis there were 11 confirmed positives for the LPT method
31
and 12 confirmed positives for the USDA reference method. All uninoculated samples
32
were negative with both methods. There were no false positives for the VIDAS method
33
(dPOD = 0, CI: -0.28 to 0.28). There was no significant difference between the LPT
34
method and the reference method using unpaired Chi-square test (
X
2
= 0.10) or the POD
35
(dPOD = 0.05, CI: -0.32 to 0.23). See Tables 4, 8, 9 in the Appendix.
36
37
52