Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  616 / 1195 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 616 / 1195 Next Page
Page Background

For the plastic analysis there were 18 confirmed positives for the LPT method and 15

1

confirmed positives for the USDA reference method. All uninoculated samples were

2

negative with both methods. There were no false positives for the VIDAS method (dPOD

3

= 0, CI: -0.21 to 0.21). There was no significant difference between the LPT method and

4

the reference method using unpaired Chi-square test (

X

2

= 1.50) or the POD (dPOD =

5

0.15, CI: -0.09 to 0.38). See Tables 6, 8, 9 in the Appendix.

6

Concrete (sealed)

7

For the concrete analysis there were 14 confirmed positives for the LPT method and 15

8

confirmed positives for the USDA reference method. All uninoculated samples were

9

negative with both methods. There were no false positives for the VIDAS method (dPOD

10

= 0, CI: -0.27 to 0.27). There was no significant difference between the LPT method and

11

the reference method using unpaired Chi-square test (

X

2

= 0.12) or the POD (dPOD =

12

0.05, CI: -0.31 to 0.22). See Tables 6, 8, 9 in the Appendix.

13

Confirmation using Ottaviani Agosti agar

14

Confirmation using direct plating of LPT broth on ALOA showed exact agreement with

15

the traditional reference plating media.

16

Overall Results

17

The inclusivity and exclusivity evaluation showed no unexpected results. The VIDAS

18

LPT method detected all of the

Listeria

strains tested and none of the non-

Listeria

strains

19

tested. For the method comparison study, there were no significant differences between

20

the LPT method and the reference method for detection of

Listeria

for the majority of the

21

foods and surfaces tested using the unpaired chi-square test at 5% level and the POD

22

analysis. There were three matrices where there was a significant difference (hot dogs,

23

mixed salad and stainless steel) with the LPT method showing significantly better

24

recovery. There was one false positive result out of the 420 low level samples tested by

25

the LPT method.

26

Overall Conclusions

27

The results of this study demonstrate that the VIDAS

®

LPT method was equivalent or

28

better than the reference methods for the detection of

Listeria

in a variety of foods and

29

select environmental surfaces. The VIDAS

®

LPT method offers a significant savings in

30

time and improved convenience when compared to the traditional reference methods by

31

using a simple one step enrichment, giving presumptive results in less than 28 hours for

32

25g food samples and less than 24h for environmental surfaces. The LPT test method

33

was determined to be equivalent to the reference methods for the detection of Listeria

34

species in 125g test portions of ground beef, deli ham and turkey and Mexican style soft-

35

cheese (queso fresco). In addition, confirmation using direct plating of LPT broth on

36

ALOA showed exact agreement with the traditional plating media

37

References

38

55