Background Image
Previous Page  303 / 552 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 303 / 552 Next Page
Page Background

INFORMS Philadelphia – 2015

301

2 - Planning for Product Substitution in Seed Business

Saurabh Bansal, Assistant Professor, Penn State University,

405 Business Building, University Park, PA, 16802,

United States of America,

sub32@psu.edu

We present new analytical results to manage seed substitution in the agribusiness

domain, and discuss results of an empirical case study in collaboration with an

industry partner.

3 - Government Intervention and Crop Diversification in Agricultural

Supply Chains

Duygu Gunaydin Akkaya, Stanford GSB, 655 Knight Way,

Stanford, CA, 94305, United States of America,

duygug@stanford.edu

, Kostas Bimpikis, Hau Lee

Agricultural supply chains face immense risks including yield and market price

uncertainty. In order to mitigate these risks, farmers can engage in crop

diversification. Governments also take a role in supporting farmers’ income and

implement various subsidies to alleviate poverty in the farmer population. We

study how interventions and diversification practices impact the supply chain in

the presence of random yield and endogenous market price.

4 - Corn or Soybean: Dynamic Farmland Allocation under Uncertainty

Onur Boyabatli, Assistant Professor of Operations Management,

Singapore Management University, 50 Stamford Road 04-01, Lee

Kong Chian School of Business, Singapore, 178899, Singapore,

oboyabatli@smu.edu.sg,

Javad Nasiry, Yangfang Zhou

This paper studies the farmland allocation decision of a farmer between two crops

in a multi-period framework. In each period, the farmer chooses the allocation in

the presence of revenue uncertainty, and crop rotation benefits across periods. We

characterize the optimal policy and investigate the impact of revenue uncertainty.

We propose a heuristic allocation policy which is near-optimal.

TB49

49-Room 105B, CC

Retail Operations

Sponsor: Manufacturing & Service Oper Mgmt/Supply Chain

Sponsored Session

Chair: Chris Parker, Pennsylvania State University, 411 Business

Building, University Park, PA, 16802, United States of America,

chris.parker@psu.edu

1 - Supply Chain Structure and Multimarket Competition

O. Cem Ozturk, Assistant Professor Of Marketing, Georgia

Institute of Technology, 800 West Peachtree St. NW., Atlanta, GA,

30308, United States of America,

cem.ozturk@scheller.gatech.edu,

Necati Tereyagoglu

We study the role of supply chain structure in determining competitive intensity

when manufacturers and retailers encounter in multiple markets. Our theoretical

model shows how the differences in supply network overlap across multiple

markets lead to higher retail prices. Using an extensive scanner data set, we find

empirical support for the analytical results. These findings show the importance of

supply chain structure in assessing multimarket competition among firms.

2 - Value of Downward Substitution under Stochastic Prices

Fehmi Tanrisever, Bilkent University, Bilkent, Ankara, Turkey,

tanrisever@bilkent.edu.tr

, Zumbul Atan, Junchi Tan

Downward substitution as a form of operational flexibility has received significant

academic attention. The literature on downward substitution follows the main

stream inventory literature and assumes uncertain demand and/or yield and

explores the value of substitution flexibility. They, however, assume fixed prices

which may distort the analysis in many industries where prices may fluctuate. In

this paper, we explore the effect of price uncertainty on the value of downward

substitution.

3 - Supply Chain Contracts that Prevent Information Leakage

Yiwei Chen, Assistant Professor, Renmin University of China, NO.

59 Zhongguancun Street, Beijing, China,

chenyiwei@rbs.org.cn

,

Ozalp Ozer

We study a supply chain with one supplier and two competing retailers

(incumbent and entrant). The incumbent has better but imprecise private

forecast. We explore general conditions that a wide range of contracts need to

satisfy to prevent the supplier from leaking the incumbent’s private forecast to the

entrant. We define two groups of contracts based on how the supplier and

retailers share inventory risks. We find only these two groups of contracts may

avoid information leakage.

4 - Experience and Competition Effects in Penny Auctions

Chris Parker, Pennsylvania State University, 411 Business

Building, University Park, PA, 16802, United States of America,

chris.parker@psu.edu

, Pranav Jindal, Tony Kwasnica,

Peter Newberry

The internet has created many new online retail opportunities. One such model is

the penny auction, an ascending first-price auction where bidders pay a fee to bid

and increase the price by a nominal amount. The winning bidder pays the auction

price and receives the item with all other bidders receiving nothing. We utilize a

detailed dataset from a penny auction company to investigate the effects of

experience and competition on bidding behavior and auction outcomes.

TB50

50-Room 106A, CC

Value Chain Innovations in Developing Economies

Sponsor: Manufacturing & Service Operations Management

Sponsored Session

Chair: Saibal Ray, Professor, McGill University, 1001 Sherbrooke Street

West, Montreal, Canada,

saibal.ray@mcgill.ca

Co-Chair: Fei Qin, Post-doc Research Fellow, McGill University,

Desautels Faculty of Management, Montreal, QC, Canada

1 - Milking the Quality Test: Improving the Milk Supply Chain under

Competing Collection Intermediaries

Liying Mu, Assistant Professor, University of Delaware,

20 Orchard Rd, Newark, 19716, United States of America,

muliying@udel.edu,

Milind Dawande, Xianjun Geng,

Vijay Mookerjee

We examine the quality issues of milk — via deliberate adulteration by milk

farmers — acquired by competing collection intermediaries in developing

countries. Interestingly, some intuitive interventions such as providing collection

stations with better infrastructure (e.g., refrigerators) or subsidizing testing costs

could hurt the quality of milk in the presence of competition. The goal of this

study is to provide recommendations that address the quality problem with

minimal testing.

2 - Low Cost Cataract Surgery in India: What Can Western Health

Systems Learn from it?

Harish Krishnan, Sauder School of Business, University of British

Columbia, Vancouver, Canada,

Harish.Krishnan@sauder.ubc.ca

The Aravind Eye Care System (AECS) in India is known for its low-cost business

model. However, few studies have done a detailed analysis of the cost structure of

a cataract surgery at the AECS. This talk will present cost data from AECS and

compare it to similar data at an eye hospital in Canada. The goal is to identify root

causes of the cost differences between AECS and western health systems. The

barriers to implementing AECS’ innovations in the west will also be discussed.

3 - Multi-treatment Inventory Allocation in Humanitarian Health

Settings under Funding Constraints

Jayashankar Swaminathan, UNC-Chapel Hill, 300 Kenan Drive,

Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, United States of America,

Jay_Swaminathan@kenan-flagler.unc.edu

, Karthik V. Natarajan

We study the problem of allocating inventory procured using donor funding to

patients in different health states over a finite horizon with the objective of

minimizing the number of disease-adjusted life periods lost. The optimal policy is

state-dependent and hence, we develop two heuristics for the allocation problem.

We also provide analytical results and computational insights regarding how the

funding level and funding timing impact program performance.

4 - Micro-entrepreneurship in Agri-food Supply Chains in

Developing Economies

Fei Qin, McGill University, Desautels Faculty of Management,

Montreal, QC, H3A1G5, Canada,

fei.qin@mcgill.ca

,

Mehmet Gumus, Saibal Ray

Motivated by Veggie-Kart direct farm-to-food initiative for marginal farmers and

retailers in developing economies, we examine the impact of supply chain

innovations involving micro-entrepreneurs at both upstream and downstream

stages, which compete with the traditional spot-market based channel in presence

of supply uncertainty.

TB50