Background Image
Previous Page  304 / 552 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 304 / 552 Next Page
Page Background

INFORMS Philadelphia – 2015

302

TB51

51-Room 106B, CC

Procurement Mechanisms

Sponsor: Manufacturing & Service Operations Management

Sponsored Session

Chair: Tharanga Rajapakshe, Assistant professor, University of Florida,

W. University Ave, Gainesville, FL, 32611, United States of America,

tharanga@ufl.edu

1 - Distressed Selling by Farmers: Model, Analysis, and Use

in Policy-Making

Shivam Gupta, PhD Candidate, UT Dallas, NJ School of

Management, 800 W. Campbell Rd., Richardson, TX, 75080,

United States of America,

sxg104920@utdallas.edu,

Ashutosh Sarkar, Ganesh Janakiraman, Milind Dawande

The surprising practice of distressed selling, where farmers sell produce to outside

agents at prices much lower than the government’s guaranteed price, is common

in developing countries. We build a tractable stochastic DP model that captures

the ground realities – limited and uncertain procurement capacity, high holding

costs, and lack of affordable credit – that lead to distressed sales. Using real

procurement data, we establish the accuracy of our model and develop useful

policy suggestions.

2 - Coordinating Procurement Decisions in Multi-division Firms

Fang Fang, Ph. D. Candidate, University of Miami, 5250

University Drive, Coral Gables, FL, 33124, United States of

America,

f.fang@umiami.edu

, Hari Natarajan

Central procurement organizations (CPO) of large firms must coordinate firm-

wide procurement to leverage volume discounts from suppliers. Facing such a

procurement coordination problem, we examine how a CPO can design internal

prices to maximize firm-wide cost savings. Our analysis of commonly-used

internal pricing rules shows interesting impacts on vendor selection, divisional

participation, and gain allocation.

3 - Does Quality Knowledge Spillover at Shared Suppliers? –

An Empirical Investigation

Suresh Muthulingam, Assistant Professor Of Supply Chain

Management, SMEAL College of Business, The Pennsylvania

State University, 460 Business Building, State College, PA, 16802,

United States of America,

sxm84@psu.edu

, Anupam Agrawal

We study the spillover of quality knowledge across supply chains. We observe the

quality performance of 191 suppliers who use the same facilities to manufacture

similar products for two distinct businesses. We find that quality knowledge spills

over under three conditions: (i) When quality efforts focus on organizational

members; (ii) When quality efforts focus on output activities of suppliers; and (iii)

When quality knowledge is developed at suppliers with low complexity.

4 - Contracting Between a Blood Bank and Hospitals

Anand Paul, University of Florida, 351 Stuzin Hall,

Gainesville, FL, United States of America,

paulaa@ufl.edu

,

Tharanga Rajapakshe

The supply of blood at a regional blood bank (RBB) is uncertain and often

insufficient to satisfy the total demand for it. The RBB typically does not observe

the demand at each hospital before determining the allocation policy. Inefficient

allocation leads to shortages at hospitals which necessitates reallocation of blood

and significant blood outdating cost. We make an analytical study of socially

optimal contracting decisions of an RBB serving multiple hospitals.

TB52

52-Room 107A, CC

Marketing and Optimal Control

Sponsor: Marketing Science

Sponsored Session

Chair: Olivier Rubel, UC Davis, Graduate School of Management, One

Shields Avenue, Davis, United States of America,

orubel@ucdavis.edu

1 - Optimal Learning to Select the Best Alternative

Tony Ke, Assistant Professor, Marketing Department, MIT Sloan

School of Management, 100 Main Street, E62-535, Cambridge,

MA, 02142, United States of America,

kete@mit.edu

,

Miguel Villas-boas

A decision maker is deciding among several alternatives with uncertain payoffs

and an outside option with known payoff. Before making a choice, he can

purchase informative signals on each alternative. We solve for the decision

maker’s optimal learning as well as stopping problem, and discuss the

implications.

2 - Automatic Feedback Control for Shunt Drainage in

Hydrocephalus Patients

Kalyan Raman, Professor, Northwestern University,

Medill School, Evanston, IL, United States of America,

kalyraman@gmail.com,

Vijay Viswanathan

Excessive intracranial pressure (ICP) resulting from insufficient drainage of

cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leads to a neurological disorder called hydrocephalus,

which is treated by implanting shunts to reduce ICP by draining excess CSF. We

use non-linear control theory to develop a mathematical algorithm for a regulator

to achieve shunt action that is significantly more sophisticated than that of a

switch.

3 - Multiattribute Pricing

Thomas Weber, Associate Professor, EPFL, CDM-ODY 3.01,

Station 5, Lausanne, VD, 1015, Switzerland,

thomas.weber@epfl.ch

We provide a technique for constructing second-best multiattribute screening

contracts in a general setting with one-dimensional types based on necessary

optimality conditions. Our approach allows for type-dependent participation

constraints and arbitrary risk profiles. As an example we discuss optimal

insurance contracts.

4 - Dynamic Incentives in Sales Force Compensation

Olivier Rubel, UC Davis, Graduate School of Management,

One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, United States of America,

orubel@ucdavis.edu,

Ashutosh Prasad

We propose dynamic principal-agent model to investigate how to incentivize sales

people when current selling efforts and carryover sales drive present sales. We

show that the carryover effect increases not only expected sales, but also sales

uncertainty. We then find that the manager incentivizes the high risk-aversion

salesperson with a concave compensation and the low risk-aversion salesperson

with a convex compensation.

TB53

53-Room 107B, CC

Behavioral Issues in the OM / Marketing Interface

Sponsor: Behavioral Operations Management

Sponsored Session

Chair: Ozalp Ozer, The University of Texas at Dallas, 800 West Campbell

Road, Richardson, TX, United States of America,

oozer@utdallas.edu

Co-Chair: Upender Subramanian, United States of America,

upender@utdallas.edu

1 - Pricing Cause Marketing Products in the Presence of

Social Comparison

Paola Mallucci, Assistant Professor of Marketing, University of

Wisconsin at Madison, 4261 Grainger Hall, 975 University Ave,

Madison, WI, 53706, United States of America,

pmallucci@bus.wisc.edu

, Tony Haitao Cui, George John

The broad takeaway from the literature on cause marketing campaigns, where

firms donate to charities with purchase, is that they generally work well, because

of ``warm glow’’. We conjecture that far from creating only positive feelings, such

firm donations can create discomfort by encouraging social comparison. We find

that firms can find it profitable to exploit such discomfort even if it decreases

consumers utility. Results apply in both monopoly and competition.

2 - Pricing and Quality Perception: Theory and Experiment

Karen Zheng, MIT, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA,

02139, United States of America,

yanchong@mit.edu,

Rim Hariss,

Georgia Perakis, Wichinpong Sinchaisri

We study how a constant pricing strategy versus a markdown strategy may

induce different perceptions of quality among consumers, and how a firm should

take these quality perceptions into account when optimizing its pricing policy for

competitive products. We empirically elicit the relationship between consumers’

perceived quality and prices under either pricing strategy, and incorporate these

relationships into our consumer model to analyze the firm’s optimal pricing

policy.

3 - Conflict of Interest and Market Structure in Multiplayer Games

Sung Ham, Assistant Professor of Marketing, George Washington

University, 2201 G St. NW, Washington, DC, 20052, United States

of America,

sungham@gwu.edu

, Jiabin Wu, Noah Lim

When a firm serves customers who compete with one another, a conflict of

interest may arise. We develop a multi-player game where firms serve competing

customers, and examine how the market structure faced by the firms impacts the

extent to which conflicts of interest affect behavior. We test our theory using an

incentive-aligned experiment and find that the decisions are consistent with the

model predictions.

TB51