Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  171 / 596 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 171 / 596 Next Page
Page Background

1

Matrix Study Results

2

3

For each method, the probability of detection (POD) was calculated as the number of positive

4

outcomes divided by the total number of trials. [13] The following were calculated: the candidate

5

presumptive results, POD

CP

;

the candidate confirmatory results, POD

CC

; the difference in the

6

candidate presumptive and confirmatory results, dPOD

CP,

; the presumptive candidate results that

7

confirmed positive, POD

C

(=POD

CC

);

the reference method, POD

R

, and the difference in the

8

confirmed candidate and reference methods, dPOD

C

. POD analyses were conducted for the

9

MDA 2 -

Listeria

test points and compared to the appropriate reference method results. The pre-

10

validation target analyte background screen results and APC results are presented in Table 5. The

11

heat stress data for selected matrixes are presented in Table 6. The inoculum levels for each

12

environmental surface are presented in Table 7. A summary of POD analyses [14] are presented

13

in Tables 8-15. As per criteria outlined in Appendix J of the Official Methods of Analysis

14

Manual [15], fractional positive results were obtained for all matrixes.

15

16

Internal Study

17

18

Raw chicken leg pieces (25 g)

19

20

For the low inoculation level of the MDA 2 -

Listeria

assay, there were 4 presumptive positives

21

and 9 confirmed positives following the USDA/FSIS MLG 8.09 reference method confirmation

22

procedure resulting in 5 false negative samples. There were 5 observed positives for the

23

reference method. For the high inoculation level, there were 3 presumptive positives and 3

24

confirmed positives following the USDA/FSIS MLG 8.09 reference method confirmation

25

procedure. There was 1 confirmed positive following the reference method. Even though 5 false

26

negatives were confirmed, analysis show there to be no statistical difference when compared to

27

the reference method. Detailed results of the POD analyses are presented in Tables 8 and 12.

28

This matrix analysis was conducted using Demi Fraser with FAC brand X.

29

30

Raw chicken fillet (25 g)

31

32

For the low inoculation level of the MDA 2 -

Listeria

assay, there were 4 presumptive positives

33

and 4 confirmed positives following the USDA/FSIS MLG 8.09 reference method confirmation

34

procedure. There were 5 observed positives for the reference method. For the high inoculation

35

level, there were 2 presumptive positives and 2 confirmed positives following the USDA/FSIS

36

MLG 8.09 reference method confirmation procedure. There were 5 confirmed positives

37

following the reference method. Detailed results of the POD analyses are presented in Tables 8

38

and 12. This matrix analysis was conducted using Demi Fraser with FAC brand Z.

39

40

41

Bagged raw spinach

42

43

Compared to FDA-BAM

44

For the low inoculation level of the MDA 2 -

Listeria

assay, there were 6 presumptive positives

45

and 6 confirmed positives following the FDA/BAM Chapter 10 reference method confirmation

46

AOAC Research Institute

Expert Review Panel Use Only

OMAMAN-29 D/ PTM Validation Report 111501

OMA ERP - June 2016

ERP Use Only