Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  176 / 596 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 176 / 596 Next Page
Page Background

Combination

(Enrichment to

lysis)

(Lysis to assay)

1

13 minutes

18 µL

18 µL

10

2

13 minutes

18 µL

22 µL

10

3

13 minutes

22 µL

18 µL

10

4

13 minutes

22 µL

22 µL

10

5

17 minutes

18 µL

18 µL

10

6

17 minutes

18 µL

22 µL

10

7

17 minutes

22 µL

18 µL

10

8

17 minutes

22 µL

22 µL

10

1

2

Results

3

4

Treatment combinations 1 and 2

5

6

For the 13 minute lysis and the 18 µL aliquot of enrichment to lysis robustness analysis of the

7

MDA 2 -

Listeria

assay, there were 6 presumptive positives out of 10 replicates at the low level

8

inoculation. For the 5 uninoculated control test portions, there were 0 presumptive positives out

9

of 5 replicates. All 5 uninoculated control test portions were negative.

10

11

For the low inoculation level, a POD value of 0.60 was obtained with a 95% confidence interval

12

of (0.31, 0.83). All 5 non-target test portions were negative with a POD value of 0.00 with a 95%

13

confidence interval of (0.00,0.43).

14

15

Treatment combinations 3 and 4

16

17

For the 13 minute lysis and the 22 µL aliquot of enrichment to lysis robustness analysis of the

18

MDA 2 -

Listeria

assay, there were 7 presumptive positives out of 10 replicates at the low level

19

inoculation. For the 5 uninoculated control test portions, there were 0 presumptive positives out

20

of five replicates.

21

22

For the low invocation level, a POD value of 0.70 was obtained with a 95% confidence interval

23

of (0.40, 0.89). All 5 non-target test portions were negative with a POD value of 0.00 with a 95%

24

confidence interval of (0.00, 0.43).

25

26

Treatment combinations 5, 6, 7 and 8

27

28

For both 17 minutes lysis procedures robustness analysis of the MDA 2 -

Listeria

assay, there

29

were 6 presumptive positives out of 10 replicates at the low level inoculation. For the 5

30

uninoculated control test portions, there were 0 presumptive positives out of 5 replicates. See

31

Table 17 for robustness results.

32

33

For the low invocation level, a POD value of 0.50 was obtained with a 95% confidence interval

34

of (0.24, 0.76). All 5 non-target test portions were negative with a POD value of 0.00 with a 95%

35

confidence interval of (0.00, 0.43).

36

AOAC Research Institute

Expert Review Panel Use Only

OMAMAN-29 D/ PTM Validation Report 111501

OMA ERP - June 2016

ERP Use Only