Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  384 / 471 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 384 / 471 Next Page
Page Background

P a g e

|

3

Discussion of Data

An amended SMPR Evaluation Form has been submitted to the ERP, containing all the SLV data for

carnitine and choline. Tab 1, Method Evaluation Form, is filled out at the top with the SMPR

requirements (from the website) and the CARN-05 performance summary. In LOD/LOQ section, note

that we have chosen to spike Adult Milk Powder, 11750017V3, at the required LOQ limits in the SMPR,

rather than supply the lowest limit we can actually quantitate. This is because we had some difficulty in

pinning down the LOQ. Measuring the blanks, which were essentially pure water, with some purified

ammonium nitrate after the digestion, provided very erratic baseline signals, especially in comparing the

two instruments used. Therefore, multiplying this noise by 10 to calculate the LOQ seemed speculative.

The more informative approach was to spike a product matrix at the LOQ limit expressed in terms of

solution concentration:

For choline, the SMPR requirement is LOQ=2.0 mg/100g RTF. That’s 20 ppm or 20,000 ppb. With a

dilution factor of roughly 1000x for a 3g sample (see method outline above), the quantitation of a 20

µg/L addition of choline in solution is needed.

For carnitine, the SMPR says LOQ = 0.16 mg/100g RTF. That’s 1.6 ppm, or 1600 ppb. Applying DF for a 3g

sample, we must be able to quantitate 1.6 ppb in solution (we chose 1.0 ppb to be conservative).

Table 1, Tab 2, shows the spike recovery data on each matrix. This was performed in duplicate on each

of three days (duplicate spikes as well as duplicate baseline values which were averaged). The spiking

was carried out at two levels: an additional 40% and 80% of the native level. This caused us to have to

extend the calibration curve a bit to accommodate the spiked samples that would normally be outside

the calibration range. Choline and carnitine were spiked together in one set of spiking experiments, then

acetylcarnitine was spiked separately in another 3 days of experiments. For a couple of products, the

native level for carnitine and acetylcarnitine is shown in red (zero level) because we spiked into these

Adult Powder products at a more routine level to demonstrate normal recoveries – the level was not

40% or 80% of the native level. Note that we later reduced the spike level into 11750017V3 to

demonstrate the LOQ for carnitine – this matrix proved to be an adequate placebo for carnitine. This

powder was also low in choline. We had to weigh an abnormally large sample size of 7.5g to try to

adequately measure the choline and carnitine in the unspiked sample, which may explain the poor

recovery (shown in red) for 11750017V3 at the 40% level. When the sample size was brought down to a

more reasonable level of 3.0g, the choline recovery was very good (see Table 5b and LOQ data).

Tables 2a and 2b, Tabs 3&4, show the means and SD of nine independent days of SRM 1849a analyses.

The total choline mean was 94.2% of the certified mean and the total carnitine mean was 110.3% of the

certified mean. The NIST values tab, Tab 5, shows that Abbott values were almost identical to those

obtained by the NIST lab themselves, with their very similar LC-MS method (publication referenced

earlier). The NIST certificate labels the result “free” carnitine, but it is in fact determined after a

microwave digestion and should be compared to Abbott’s “total” carnitine result. The true free carnitine

is about 88% of the total in SRM 1849a (see Table 7d). Perhaps there was some confusion in the

Candidates for 2016 Method of the Year

322