15 / 15
D I SCUS S I ON
2 6 5
25
Ibid.,
pp. 68--94.
26
Ibid.,
pp. 84--86.
27 Ibid.,
pp. 73--90.
28 Ibid.,
pp. 130--177.
29 The literature on externalities and spill-over costs represents a partial recognition of
this issue within neo-classical economic theory. See R. Marris, (ed.),
The Corporate
Society,
1974, Macmillan Press, pp. 251--399.
30 H. Marcuse,
Eros and Civilization,
1962, Vintage Books, pp. 96--114.
31 For an example of the contextual theory of meaning see T. S. Kuhn,
The Structure of
Scientific Revolutions,
1970, University of Chicago Press.
32 See A. J. Ayer,
Language, Truth and Logic,
1952, Dover Publications.
33 Extreme statements of this position may be found in Veblen, McLuhan, and Ellul.
See. L. Winner,
Autonomous Technology,
1977, MIT Press, pp. 237--305.
34 M. Weber, 'The Meaning of Ethical Neutrality' in
Methodology of the Social
Sciences,
1949, Free Press, pp. 19--27.
3s An insightful discussion of the contradictory interests of intellectuals can be found
in A. W. Gouldner,
The Future of Intellectuals and the Rise of the New Class,
1979,
Seabury Press.
3~ j. Habermas, 1971, pp. 280--2.
37 K. Marx,
Capital,
Vol. I. 1967. International Publishers, pp. 484--488.
3s K. Marx,
Capital,
Vol. I. 1977, Vintage Books, pp. 163--77.
39 j. Ellul,
The TechnologicalSociety,
1970, Alfred Knopf, pp. 428--36.
40 A. Toffier,
The Third Wave,
1980, William Morrow & Company, pp. 408--460.
Carleton College,
Department of Sociology~Anthropology,
Northfield, MN 55057,
U.S.A.
NADER SA I ED I