307 / 311
Page 4 of 8
Method Performance Feedback 2014.03
STATISTICAL REVIEW: Is the documentation for the statistical review prior to AOAC First Action Official
Methods status available and completed?
i believe so
This was very thoroughly done
Unknown, not presented here.
As a ERP member that approved it to first action, the method was reviewed and met the guidelines of Appendix
D: Collaborative study procedures to validate Characteristics of a Method of Analysis.
Yes
The reproducibility was presented in the paper but not measurement uncertainty.
Yes
Please cite below the OMA Appendicies, Community Guidance, or SMPR by which this method was reviewed
against.
none
This is not applicable. Study was began long before SMPR development started at the AOAC.
1) Community Guidance as published in the provided review documents
2) Method author feedback
NA there was no SMPR to my knowledge
No SMPR exists for this method.
AOAC validation guides used for SLV
Appendix D of OMA was used as criteria for MLT. Representative pesticides were selected for the MLT based on
guidance from AOAC Method Centric Committee on Pesticides Residues.
The main concern for this method was sample hydration that is samples need to be hydrated prior to organic
solvent extraction. However, there were no concerns reported by end-users from method feedback.
No SMPR exists for this method.
AOAC validation guides used for SLV
Appendix D of OMA was used as criteria for MLT
Based upon the feedback submitted, are there any recommended changes to the AOAC First Action method as
written?
No
No, Of the 15 feedback responses obtained all were highly complimentary, confirming that the method is
reproducible in their hands
Yes, 1) There were multiple safety concerns although these were not documented.
2) more information on source of reference materials
3) More information on availability of Cleanert
4) More information on results of Harmonized PT results of the method