![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0308.png)
Page 5 of 8
Method Performance Feedback 2014.03
in real tea samples
Yes, There was one comment that the sample preparation is time consuming. i.e, rotatory evaporation. That is
what the method uses, so to my knowledge that has not been addressed.
No
No
No
Has the method author addressed any specific AOAC Final Action requirements as noted by the ERP, if any?
yes
The author had addressed the feedback responses of the SLV study and those following the collaborative study
Yes - specifically the concern over lack of a hydration step was addressed in the first ERP meeting
The author did all what the ERP asked for
Has this method received any additional recognitions?
na
Method was nominated and won an award at the 2016 Annual meeting
None noted
It was the AOAC 2015 Method of the Year
The method was granted “2015 Method of the Year”
No sure
The method was granted “2011 Method of the Year”
Please cite the OMA Method, Number, etc.
AOAC Official Method 2014.09
Determination and Confirmation of Residues of 653 pesticides and Chemical Pollutants in Tea
OMA method 2014.09 has several additional publications following the validation of the collaborative study
method
2014.09
Pang, et. al
2014.09
OMA 2014.09