Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  127 / 130 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 127 / 130 Next Page
Page Background

Name that Section: Frequently Used Education Code and Title 5 Sections for Community College Districts

©2018 (c) Liebert Cassidy Whitmore

127

280

Id

.

281

Ed. Code, § 88023.

282

See Ed. Code, § 88123. Non-merit districts are not prohibited from instituting such compulsory leaves.

However, such procedures are established by board policy and labor negotiating in non-merit districts, rather

than by statute, since there is no statute that regulates this issue.

283

Ed. Code, § 88123.

284

Ed. Code, § 88024.

285

Ed. Code, § 87013.

286

Ed. Code, § 87406.5.

287

Ed. Code, § 88122.

288

EEOC Enforcement Guidance on the Consideration of Arrest and Conviction Records in Employment

Decisions under Title VII issued on 4/25/2012 [Notice No. 9.15.002]. This Enforcement Guidance consolidates

and supercedes the EEOC’s 1987 and 1990 policy statements on the issue as well as the discussion on this issue

in Section VI.B.2 of the Race & Color Discrimination Compliance Manual Chapter. The Enforcement

Guidance can be found at

http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/arrest_conviction.cfm#IV.

289

EEOC Questions and Answers About the EEOC’s Enforcement Guidance on the Consideration of Arrest and

Conviction Records in Employment Decisions under Title VII issued on 4/25/2012.

See

http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/qa_arrest_conviction.cfm.

290

EEOC Enforcement Guidance on the Consideration of Arrest and Conviction Records in Employment

Decisions under Title VII issued on 4/25/2012 [Notice No. 9.15.002]

superseding

the discussion on this issue in

EEOC Compliance Manual [Notice 915.003], Section 15: Race and Color Discrimination, Subdivision VI(B),

issued 4/19/06

.

.

See

http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/arrest_conviction.cfm#IV.

291

EEOC Enforcement Guidance on the Consideration of Arrest and Conviction Records in Employment

Decisions under Title VII issued on 4/25/2012 [Notice No. 9.15.002]

superseding

the discussion on this issue in

EEOC Compliance Manual [Notice 915.003], Section 15: Race and Color Discrimination, Subdivision VI(B),

issued 4/19/06

.

.

See

http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/arrest_conviction.cfm#IV.

292

EEOC Enforcement Guidance on the Consideration of Arrest and Conviction Records in Employment

Decisions under Title VII issued on 4/25/2012 [Notice No. 9.15.002]

superseding

the discussion on this issue in

EEOC Compliance Manual [Notice 915.003], Section 15: Race and Color Discrimination, Subdivision VI(B),

issued 4/19/06

.

.

See

http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/arrest_conviction.cfm#IV.

293

EEOC Enforcement Guidance on the Consideration of Arrest and Conviction Records in Employment

Decisions under Title VII issued on 4/25/2012 [Notice No. 9.15.002]

superseding

the discussion on this issue in

EEOC Compliance Manual [Notice 915.003], Section 15: Race and Color Discrimination, Subdivision VI(B),

issued 4/19/06

.

.

See

http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/arrest_conviction.cfm#IV

294

EEOC Enforcement Guidance on the Consideration of Arrest and Conviction Records in Employment

Decisions under Title VII issued on 4/25/2012 [Notice No. 9.15.002]

superseding the discussion on this issue in

EEOC Compliance Manual [Notice 915.003], Section 15: Race and Color Discrimination, Subdivision VI(B),

issued 4/19/06

.

.

See

http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/arrest_conviction.cfm#IV.

295

EEOC Questions and Answers About the EEOC’s Enforcement Guidance on the Consideration of Arrest and

Conviction Records in Employment Decisions under Title VII issued on 4/25/2012.

See

http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/qa_arrest_conviction.cfm.

296

Green v. Missouri Pac. R. Co

. (8th Cir. 1977) 549 F.2d 1158, 1160 (upholding the district court’s injunction

prohibiting the employer from using an applicant’s conviction record as an absolute bar to employment but

allowing it to consider a prior criminal record as a factor in making individual hiring decisions, as long as the

defendant took these three factors into account).