Background Image
Previous Page  92 / 128 Next Page
Basic version Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 92 / 128 Next Page
Page Background

Technical article

March 2013

90

www.read-eurowire.com

DuPont Chemicals

and Fluoroproducts

1007 North Market Street

Wilmington, Delaware

USA

Tel

: +1 302 774 1000

Website

:

www.dupont.com

Email

:

www.info@dupont.com

Increasing the gas pressure higher than

1,000 psig will cause too high of a gas

flow resulting in over foaming. This over

foaming condition is often misunderstood

as to be a material or processing problem.

Conversely, if the injector orifice is too

small there may not be enough available

gas pressure to obtain the gas flow

needed. This will result in an inability to

achieve the desired expansion rate and

product capacitance. For this reason it

is typical to have several injectors with

different flow rates available over a wide

range of pressures.

The number of different sizes needed

varies with the product mix and available

gas pressure. Utilising a high-pressure

nitrogen pump increases the gas

pressure range over that produced from a

high-pressure cylinder.

The use of a pump can then help reduce

the number of injector sizes needed for an

operation leading to lower overall costs.

The injector design can also impact

performance.

Figure 5

shows the result

of trials comparing four commercially

available injector styles as quantified by

the gas flow variation and the resultant

capacitance variation.

A 50-ohm core with a 23-gauge conductor

foamed to approximately 50 per cent was

used for these trials. The gas flow rate six

sigma variation (± 3 standard deviations)

ranged from 4cc/min to 27cc/min with a

resultant capacitance variation of 0.3 to

3.8pf/ft. These results demonstrate that

performance issues often attributed to

the fluoropolymer material are typically a

processing issue related to the equipment.

Use of the wrong-sized injector or an

unstable design can mask the true

performance benefit of certain materials.

Product cooling

The cooling medium for the extruded core

is usually a combination of ambient air

and water. The distance required for each

of these is dependent on product size and

line speed. Having the correct distances

is critical for cooling prior to wire take-up

to avoid flattening of the insulation on

the reel and impacting the electrical

performance.

By keeping the water quench point

distance as far from the crosshead as

possible will yield the best product. This is

because a long air-cooling distance gives

time for the resin to shrink down onto the

conductor providing a consistent, tight

interface with the conductor without the

use of excessive preheat.

This

consistent

conductor

interface

provides a uniform insulation strip force

even after the initial bond is broken.

The advantage is improved structural

return loss and resistance to stresses

of subsequent processing operations.

Sometimes a long air-cooling distance is

not an option because of total available

cooling distance.

If this is the case cold water should be

avoided in the first cooling section as

excessive ovality of the insulation and low

conductor adhesion can result.

Figure 6

:

Cross section of foam core with solid skin outer layer

Tempered cooling is recommended

as it reduces the initial shock on the

insulation improving insulation ovality and

conductor adhesion.

Skinning

Extruding an outer layer of solid material

or skinning provides additional benefits,

such as:

• An easy and efficient way of colouring

the insulation

• Improved dielectric strength, which is

useful on thinner wall cable designs

• Higher foam expansion rates

• Greater resistance to insulation damage

during subsequent processing such as

twinning or braiding

Applying a solid skin coat requires an

initial equipment investment (an auxiliary

extruder and special crosshead) but

provides payback in reduced scrap and

product cost. Both the foam and solid layer

are achieved at the same time through

a single cross- head using standard

processing methods.

Figure 6

illustrates a

foam core with a coloured solid outer layer.

Conclusions

There are various foamable fluoropolymer

resin options available, each having

unique

capabilities

and

limitations.

Selecting the correct resin for the

application is important for cost, ease

of processing and desired electrical

performance.

Designing and processing cables within

the materials’ capabilities will produce

quality products with high yields.

Processing equipment selection and

process conditions are critical to ensure

a stable process, maintain minimum

product variation and achieve the lowest

cost operation.

Special techniques, such as the addition

of solid skin layer(s) to foam constructions,

can provide additional improvements to

processing and performance.

n

This paper was presented at the IWCS

symposium November 2011.