Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  203 / 258 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 203 / 258 Next Page
Page Background

G

olay

&

M

oulin

:

J

ournal of

AOAC I

nternational

V

ol

.

99, N

o

.

1, 2016 

219

(

5

)

Performance of the transesterification.

—Record the

areas of the two internal standard peaks (methyl undecanoate

and tritridecanoin) in the analyzed samples. The performance of

transesterification (Pt) expressed as a percentage, is calculated

on the recovery of the tritridecanoin as a second internal

standard as follows:

=

× × ×

×

×

(

)

100

11

13

13 13

11

13

Pt

m A R S TAG

A m

c

c

c

c

c

c

where

m

c11

is the mass in milligrams of the C11:0 internal

standard added to the solution;

A

c13

is the peak area of the C13:0

internal standard in the chromatogram;

R

c13

is the response

factor of C13:0 relative to C11:0, calculated according to

G

(

1

);

S

c13

is the stoichiometric factor to convert C13:0 FAME into

C13:0 TAG;

A

c11

is the peak area of the C11:0 internal standard

in the chromatogram; and

m

c13

is the mass in milligrams of the

C13:0 internal standard added to the solution.

The performance of the transesterification method should

be always 100.0±2.0%. When the performance of the

transesterification is >102.0 or <98.0%, the origin of the

problem could be the following: incomplete transesterification,

partial degradation of internal standard(s), or a matrix effect

problem. The evaluation of transesterification performance in

a blank sample can be used to monitor the stability of reagents

and chemicals.

Results and Discussion

Forty-six analytes (Table 2) were recorded in 12 selected

samples (Table 1) analyzed as double blinds (i.e., 24 analyses)

by 18 participants; in total, 19 872 results were collected from

the study. The results were carefully evaluated and summarized

in an Excel template used for statistical evaluation. Single values

reported for one double-blind sample were removed from the

evaluation, and a list of fatty acids was selected according to

the composition (dairy versus nondairy) of analyzed samples

and their abundance. Outlier values were removed based on

Cochran and/or Grubbs tests following the ISO 5725 guideline.

All statistical decisions regarding the evaluation of data were

carefully recorded and provided to the ERP to assist in their

decision to accord Final Action status in July 2014.

Results corresponding to Samples 1–6 were expressed in

grams per 100 g finished product, except for Sample 5 (cheese),

which are expressed in grams per 100 g extracted fat from cheese.

Results corresponding to SPIFAN Samples 7–9 in powder form

were expressed in grams per 100 g reconstituted product (25 g

powder with 200 g water), and Samples 10–12 were expressed

in grams per 100 g liquid products. Results for Samples 7–12

were reported using criteria defined in AOAC SMPR 2012.011.

As previously discussed with the ERP during SLV data

evaluation, the requirements for repeatability and reproducibility

are not fully consistent with the whole range of fatty acids

concentration found in the samples. Values were given for fatty

acid concentrations of <0.5, ≥0.5 to <3.0, and ≥3.0 g/100 g;

however, the quantification limit is (≤0.001) is 500 times lower

than the lower fatty acid concentration indicated in SMPR (0.5).

The performance requirement at the level of 0.5 cannot be the

same for a fatty acid in a concentration at 0.499 in a sample and

at 0.001 in another sample (500 times lower). As a consequence,

additional limits for repeatability and reproducibility values

also need to be fixed in the SMPR for concentrations below

0.5. Proposed repeatability and reproducibility limits are shown

in Table 3.

The transesterification performance (i.e., recovery between

C11:0 FAME and C13:0 TAG) was monitored in all samples and

ranged between 98.9 and 100.0% with an RSD value between

0.9 and 1.6%, except for a cheese sample (2.7%).

A questionnaire was sent to all participants, along with an

invitation to give comments about the performance of the

method in their laboratory. Feedback was requested with respect

Table 2. Analytes

Fatty acid

Abrev.

Fatty acids analyzed

Individual fatty acid

 C18:2

n

-6

LA

C18:2

n

-6

 C18:3

n

-3

ALA

C18:3

n

-3

 C20:4

n

-6

ARA

C20:4

n

-6

 C20:5

n

-3

EPA

C20:5

n

-3

 C22:6

n

-3

DHA

C22:6

n

-3

Group of fatty acid

 Saturated fatty acids

SFAs

C4:0, C6:0, C8:0, C10:0, C12:0, C14:0, C15:0, C16:0, C17:0, C18:0, C20:0, C22:0, and C24:0

 Monounsaturated fatty acids

MUFAs

C14:1

n

-5, C15:1

n

-5, C16:1

n

-7, C17:1

n

-7, C18:1

n

-9 (and other

cis

isomers),

C20:1

n

-9, C22:1

n

-9, and C24:1

n

-9

 Polyunsaturated fatty acids

PUFAs

C18:2

n

-6, C18:3

n

-6, C18:3

n

-3, C20:2

n

-6, C20:3

n

-3, C20:3

n

-6, C20:4

n

-6,

C20:5

n

-3, C22:2

n

-6, and C22:6

n

-3

Trans

fatty acids

TFAs

C18:1

trans

, C18:2

trans

, and C18:3

trans

 Omega-3

ω-3

C18:3

n

-3, C20:3

n

-3, C20:5

n

-3, and C22:6

n

-3

 Omega-6

ω-6

C18:2

n

-6, C18:3

n

-6, C20:2

n

-6, C20:3

n

-6, C20:4

n

-6, and C22:2

n

-6

 Omega-9

ω-9

C18:1

n

-9, C20:1

n

-9, C22:1

n

-9, and C24:1

n

-9

Sum of all fatty acids

 Total fatty acids

All fatty acids (including CLAs and omega fatty acids)

Transesterification performance

TP

C11:0 and C13:0 (internal standards)

203