Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  239 / 478 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 239 / 478 Next Page
Page Background

CHAPTER 12

More Advanced Forms

Now let’s look at some more advanced forms usage. We’ve helped our users to avoid

blank list items, now let’s help them avoid duplicate items.

This chapter goes into more intricate details of Django’s form validation, and you can

consider it optional if you already know all about customising Django forms. If you’re

still learning Django, there’s good stuff in here. If you want to skip ahead, that’s OK too.

Make sure you take a quick look at the aside on developer stupidity, and the recap on

testing views at the end.

Another FT for Duplicate Items

We add a second test method to

ItemValidationTest

:

functional_tests/test_list_item_validation.py (ch12l001).

def

test_cannot_add_duplicate_items

(

self

):

# Edith goes to the home page and starts a new list

self

.

browser

.

get

(

self

.

server_url

)

self

.

get_item_input_box

()

.

send_keys

(

'Buy wellies

\n

'

)

self

.

check_for_row_in_list_table

(

'1: Buy wellies'

)

# She accidentally tries to enter a duplicate item

self

.

get_item_input_box

()

.

send_keys

(

'Buy wellies

\n

'

)

# She sees a helpful error message

self

.

check_for_row_in_list_table

(

'1: Buy wellies'

)

error

=

self

.

browser

.

find_element_by_css_selector

(

'.has-error'

)

self

.

assertEqual

(

error

.

text

,

"You've already got this in your list"

)

Why have two test methods rather than extending one, or having a new file and class?

It’s a judgement call. These two feel closely related; they’re both about validation on the

same input field, so it feels right to keep them in the same file. On the other hand, they’re

logically separate enough that it’s practical to keep them in different methods:

211