Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  241 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 241 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S228

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

SABR treatments. The potential benefits may include real-

time, good quality image guidance without additional

radiation. We are optimistic that improvements in the

detector and collimation system, will lead to better image

quality, more accurate tumor localizations, and possible

3D reconstruction of patient’s anatomy within the

irradiated region.

OC-0438 The impact of a 1.5 T MR-Linac fringe field

on neighbouring linear accelerators.

T. Perik

1

, J. Kaas

1

, F. Wittkamper

1

1

The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of

Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Purpose or Objective

In our institution a clinical prototype of the MR-

Linac(MRL)(Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) was installed

in an existing treatment room. The MRL, which has a field

strength of 1.5 T, is neighboured by 3 clinical Elekta

accelerators at a distance (Isocenter MRL to gun linac) of

7.5 and 5.5 and 11 meters. The peripheral magnetic field

outside of the magnet core of the MRL, the fringe field,

may influence the beam steering of accelerators in

adjacent treatment rooms. This influence for a pre-

clinical prototype was described by Kok et al. in 2009. The

aim of this study is to investigate the influence of the

significantly reduced fringe field of the clinical prototype

on the beam steering of its neighbouring accelerators.

Material and Methods

A STARCHECK MAXI detector array (PTW Freiburg,

Germany) was mounted on all the neighbouring

accelerators with a frame that puts the array on isocentre

height. An inclinometer was attached to the gantry to

acquire a gantry rotation signal. For every available

energy, two 360 degree arcs (clockwise and counter

clockwise) were irradiated with a 40x40 field. A

measurement of beam profile was acquired in movie mode

at a frame rate 2.5 Hz. Beam symmetry (IEC) was

determined for every frame.

These measurements were done before and after ramping

up the MRL magnet, and a 3

rd

time after adjusting the

look-up tables (LUT) which correct the beam steering by

applying a gantry-angle dependent current to the steering

coils (2R and 2T). These LUTs were adjusted using the

accelerator internal monitor chamber.

Results

A change in beam symmetry as a function of gantry angle,

before and after ramping the magnet, of up to 4% (Linac

A) and 1% (Linac B) is observed, causing beam symmetry

on both linacs to be out of tolerance (IEC 102%). Linac C

did not show any significant change. Figure 2 shows the

LUT before ramping the magnet (pre) and after

adjustment (post) and the difference for Linac A for the

10 MV beam. After adjustment of the beam steering on

Linac A and B, the symmetry was within tolerance for all

gantry angles. Adjusting the LUTs took 1.5 hours per linac.

Conclusion

The influence of the MRL fringe field is less than described

by Kok for the pre-clinical prototype, but does still

influence the beam steering of the accelerators in

adjacent treatment rooms. The LUTs of 2 accelerators,

that were situated the closest to the MRL, but outside the

0.5 Gauss line, needed to be adjusted in order to get beam

parameters within tolerances. Adjusting the LUTs fully

corrected the influence of the magnetic fringe field of the

MRL. In case of an unexpected ramp down of the magnet

(i.e. quench) both neighbouring accelerators cannot be

used clinically before the LUTs are adjusted to the new

situation. Adjustment of the LUT can be done in a short

time by experienced personnel, without a dedicated

measurement

device.

References:

Kok et al., Phys. Med. Biol.

54

(2009) N409–N415

OC-0439 Treating patients with Dynamic Wave Arc: first

clinical experience

M. Burghelea

1

, D. Verellen

2

, J. Dhont

1

, C. Hung

3

, K.

Poels

4

, R. Van den Begin

1

, M. Boussaer

1

, K. Tournel

1

, C.

Jaudet

1

, T. Reynders

1

, T. Gevaert

1

, V. Simon

5

, M. De

Ridder

1

1

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel- Vrije Universiteit

Brussel, Department of Radiotherapy, Brussels, Belgium

2

GZA Ziekenhuizen- Sint Augustinus – Iridium

Kankernetwerk Antwerpen, Radiotherapy Department,