Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  797 / 1082 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 797 / 1082 Next Page
Page Background

S781

ESTRO 36 2017

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Conclusion

A split field model was generated for the whole range of

field sizes of a beam modulator linear accelerator from

0.8x0.8 cm

2

to 16x21 cm

2

using field size dependent

photon beam energy spectra. The model was successfully

validated independently and was found have a good

agreement with measured doses and relative output

factors.

EP-1479 Gamma 3D analysis for VMAT treatments

using two detector arrays

E.M. Ambroa Rey

1

, D. Navarro Jiménez

1

, A. Ramirez

Muñoz

1

, R. Gómez Pardos

1

, D. Amat de los Angeles

1

, A.

Gibert Serrano

1

, A. López Muñoz

1

, M. Parcerisa Torné

1

,

M. Colomer Truyols

1

1

Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Medical Physics Unit-

Radiation Oncology Department, Terrassa, Spain

Purpose or Objective

The development of advanced radiation therapy

techniques, such as volumetric modulated arc therapy

(VMAT), requires a patient-specific pre-treatment quality

assurance (QA). Two-dimensional array detectors are

widely used for dose distribution verifications and the 3D

gamma index is one of the metrics which have been

extensively used for clinical routine patient specific QA.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the 3D gamma index

for different VMAT plans, such as head and neck (H&N) and

prostate, with the Octavius 4D system using two 2D-arrays

(PTW Octavius4D 1500 and PTW Octavius4D 729).

Material and Methods

Fourteen H&N and ten prostate VMAT plans were created

and their respective QA plans were developed using

Monaco 5.1 treatment planning system and delivered by

an Elekta Synergy Linac equipped with an Agility 160 MLC

system. The cylindrical phantom Octavius 4D was used to

measure the dose distribution.

The 2D-array Octavius 729 consists of 729 vented

ionization chambers arranged in a 27x27 matrix with a

spatial resolution of 10mm.The chamber volume is

0.125cm

3

. The Octavius 1500 array has the same layout

and dimensions but with 1405 ionization chambers with a

chamber volume of

0.06cm

3

.

In order to reconstruct and analyze the measured 3D dose

from each plan, the PTW VeriSoft 6.2 patient plan

verification software was used and a volumetric 3D gamma

index analysis (max dose of calculated volume, suppress

dose below 10% of max dose of calculated volume) for both

3%3mm and 2%2mm criteria was performed to compare

and evaluate the measured and calculated doses for both

arrays.

Results

Table I summarizes the results for both cases. The mean

pass rate of global 3D gamma index for all prostate cases

was superior to 99% with 3%3mm and 95% with 2%2mm

criteria. The Octavius1500 achieves higher results for both

criteria. The mean difference was 2.9% for the gamma

2%2mm

and

0.6%

for

the

3%3mm.

For the H&N cases, the mean passing rate was lower than

prostate cases. Similarly, the Octavius1500 obtain better

results for both criteria. The mean difference was 4.2% for

the gamma 2%2mm and 0.8% for the 3%3mm.

Expectedly, the greatest differences between Octavius

1500 and 729 are shown in the gamma 2%2mm criteria.

Figure 1 shows a comparison between the gamma 2%2mm

for both detectors for a H&N case.

Conclusion

As we expected, the Octavius 1500 achieves a better

result for pre-treatment VMAT plan verification and the

results are more remarkable for the gamma 2%2mm

criteria. In addition, plans with a higher complexity such

H&N can benefit from the superior results of the Octavius

1500.

Moreover, the Octavius 1500 present the possibility to

increase the spatial sampling frequency and the coverage

of a dose distribution by merging two measurements. We

can conclude that Octavius 1500 outperformed Octavius

729 for VMAT pre-treatment QA.

EP-1480 Patient-specific QA for CyberKnife MLC plans

using Monte Carlo